Showing posts with label waters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label waters. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

Healing Waters by Dr Bruce Becker

If you think the water just makes people feel 
good, you don’t know the half of it. Here’s a 
physiological explanation of the surprising and 
amazing ways the simple act of being in the 
water promotes well-being.

It doesn’t take long to notice that people in pools 
are having fun. Nor does it take long to see 
happy faces in a group of aquatic exercisers, or a 
smile replace the facial stress lines of someone
sinking into a hot tub. The feeling of relaxation 
after a vigorous pool workout is wonderful, and
unlike most other exercise experiences.

As a scientist, I’ve been impressed with the 
consistency and universality of these observa-
tions. When I began to work with Olympic 
athletes who were used to vigorous exercise 
routines, they often commented on the difference
in their post-exercise comfort from an aquatic 
exercise session vs. their normal exercise routine
. But there’s too much scientist in me not to 
wonder why these findings occur with such 
frequency and regularity. As I researched the 
medical literature,I couldn’t find much to 
explain such common events. But when I began 
to dig into the basic science literature, I did find 
information that provided some potential 
explanation.

The physiology of immersion has been studied 
extensively since we prepared to put man into
space in the late 1960s because the closest proxy
to weightlessness on the planet is to be found
when immersed in water. To study the physio-
logical changes that would occur in space, it
became important to study those changes 
occurring during immersion. The physiological 
alterations were profound and led to further 
research of specific body systems. Still, most of 
this research was not translated into medical 
applications, but rather, was located in highly 
scientific physiology journals.

Even today, there’s relatively little research on 
the clinical applications of aquatic activity or 
exercise to be found in medical journals. This 
crossover from basic science into clinical
application is called translational research
and it is only beginning to emerge for aquatics.
But as more people turn to the water for therapy 
and healing, that body of evidence is growing 
daily. If the industry can capitalize on these
findings, understand and promote them
effectively, aquatics could become the next big
health craze, with the promise of helping
everything from high blood pressure
to heart failure. 
Given that the American Heart Association says
72 million Americans suffer from high blood 
pressure and more than 79 million have cardio-
vascular disease, that could be a powerful 
incentive. The nation, in turn, could save huge
amounts in health expenses if the public were 
educated about the value of aquatic activity, if 
the political powers directed public expenditures
toward pool construction to improve public 
access and the medical establishment understood
the potential value of aquatic activity across a 
wide range of clinical problems. But it must start
with us. It must start with understanding why 
water is so healing.

Finding balance

To understand why aquatics is so good for your 
health, you must first understand some basic 
physiology. Our bodies are constantly trying to 
seek a physiological balance point called 
homeostasis. This state preserves optimum 
function despite changes in position, activity, 
stress, aging or disease. The effort to find 
homeostasis is what propels most of the 
functional adaptations that occur during 
immersion in water, with some changes being 
immediate and others only after a period of time.
Like many adaptations, a cascade of other 
physiological changes occur, some sequentially 
and some concurrently.
Here’s how it works: Because water compresses
the body, it pushes blood into the deep vessels
during immersion. As the bather steps into 
deeper water, blood is pushed upward, first into
the large capacity vessels of the pelvis and 
abdomen. Then as depth increases yet further, 
blood is pushed above the diaphragm into the 
chest. With neck depth immersion, nearly three-
quarters of a quart (1 US quart=946.353 ml) of 
blood is displaced, with two-thirds of it going 
into large pulmonary vessels and one-third into 
the heart.
The heart responds to this extra volume of blood
by increasing the amount propelled with each 
beat, which is called stroke volume. At rest 
during neck-depth immersion, stroke volume 
normally increases approximately 30 percent. 
The total volume of blood propelled by the heart 
during a minute is called cardiac output, and this
also increases nearly 30 percent. That’s approxi-
mately the same increase that occurs during light
exercise, so even at rest during neck-depth
immersion, the heart is performing just as it 
would during exercise on land. At the same time
, the body senses that more blood is being
pushed into circulation,so to adjust, the arterial 
blood vessels relax without causing an increase 
in blood pressure. Thus, healthy individuals will
lower their blood pressure during immersion, 
and usually so will individuals with elevated
blood pressure (hypertension.) The magnitude
of this drop is related to the temperature of the
water.

Usually, there’s an initial brief increase in blood 
pressure upon entering cold water and also 
extremely warm water. Maybe that’s why in the 
past, it was often stated that individuals with 
hypertension should avoid hot tubs. Many 
physical therapy texts also say that patients with 
elevated blood pressure should not undergo 
aquatic therapy. In actual fact, immersion may 
benefit such patients.

Heart and health

Patients with congestive heart failure are another
clinical population that has been counseled to 
avoid aquatic exercise or even immersion. But 
several recent Japanese and Israeli studies have 
found that for people with mild to moderate 
heart failure, aquatics may be a very useful and 
therapeutic environment. That’s because 
immersion offers a unique combination of 
benefits: It decreases circulatory resistance and 
improves heart contraction efficiency. One of 
these studies compared the effects of aquatic 
exercise with rest in a group of patients with 
moderate congestive heart failure. It was found 
that the aquatic exercise group of patients 
significantly improved in muscle function, 
walking distance, aerobic fitness and exercise 
capacity.
They also experienced nearly 40 percent
improvement in their quality of life. One reason
may be that during immersion, the increased 
blood volume is pushed into deeper tissues. 
Muscle circulation then improves and there’s a 
consequent increase in oxygen delivery, which 
is useful for muscle healing or recovering from 
exercise. A study done on astronauts in training 
showed that the blood flow into their calves was
increased by nearly 250 percent at rest during
neck-depth immersion. At the same time, the 
kidneys see an increase in blood volume. 
Sensors within the heart and elsewhere interpret 
the increase in blood volume as a potential 
overload, so the body sends signals to the
endocrine system to reduce this blood volume. 
As a result, the kidneys begin their role in 
regulating blood volume through excreting 
sodium and potassium, and along with those 
ions, water. As all aquatics professionals have 
experienced firsthand, this process produces an
increase in urine volume and the kidneys also 
become slightly more efficient. In ancient Greek
and Roman times, when medications were very
limited, immersion was actually used as a way 
to treat individuals with kidney disease.
Stress is another ailment that immersion can 
help alleviate. Some of the same hormones that 
the body uses to regulate arterial function and 
tone are a component part of our body’s 
response to stress. These hormones are called 
catacholamines. During immersion, the body 
sends out a signal to alter the balance of these 
catacholamines in a manner that is similar to the 
balance found during relaxation or meditation.
Not all of the effects of this alteration are known
, but probably these changes are important in 
modifying the heart rhythm in a manner to 
mimic a relaxed state, and also in creating some 
of the feeling of relaxation that occurs following 
aquatic activity.

Exercise and endurance

The connection between exercise and stress 
reduction has been well-established, and the
work the body must do in water may be one 
reason. During immersion, compression of the 
chest wall combined with the increased blood 
volume makes it more work to breathe — 
approximately 60 percent more with water up 
to the neck. This, in turn, can lead not only to 
lower stress,but also better performance during 
land workouts.
In my experience working with Olympic level
athletes, a frequent comment was how much the 
aquatic workouts had added to their overall 
feeling of fitness. I believe what they were 
noticing is that strengthening the muscles of 
respiration had significantly improved their 
respiratory efficiency, so during a land based
workout they didn’t feel so “winded.”
If the workload increase is 60 percent during 
inactive immersion, there is almost certainly a 
much greater workload increase during 
immersed exercise. Blood and water are viscous
substances, and the force required to move 
against viscosity is related to velocity in a 
complex equation. Essentially, as the frequency 
of respiration increases, so does the work of 
displacing blood from the chest cavity to allow 
air in. The chest wall must then expand against
the compression of surrounding water. As a 
consequence, deep-water exercise potentially
could be a very useful method of strengthening 
the muscles of respiration,which could be 
helpful in athletes, as well as in the rehabilita-
tion of people with respiratory weakness or 
other lung diseases.

We decided to test that possibility in astudy 
completed last year at Washington State 
University. We worked with two groups of WSU
students, 50 in each group. One group did land-
based aerobics for a 50-minute period, three 
times per week for a semester.
The other group did aquatic aerobics 50 minutes
per session three times per week. We measured 
aerobic conditioning, percent age of body fat, 
and a number of measures of respiratory 
efficiency and strength. All of the students 
increased in their aerobic fitness, all decreased 
their body fat percentages, and all improved in 
some of the respiratory measures. But only the 
aquatic students showed improvement in their 
respiratory endurance measures. We plan to 
repeat this study with more focus on higher-fit 
student athletes to see if the same effect is noted.
There is a potentially major benefit of improving
respiratory endurance because as the muscles of 
respiration fatigue, the body begins to shunt 
blood from the lower extremities up to the chest 
muscles to support respiratory effort. Obviously, 
in an athlete who is reliant upon the legs, 
robbing these muscles of blood flow to supply 
the muscles of respiration causes a decrease in 
athletic performance. A basketball player who is
getting respiratory fatigue will “hang on his 
shorts,” which can be seen often at the end of a 
basketball game. This action aids the accessory 
muscles of respiration. But if at the same time, 
the leg muscles are being starved of blood, the 
player is going to feel like his or her legs are 
“dead.” Studies have shown that exercise 
activities to improve endurance of the muscles 
of respiration actually do improve athletic 
performance, but deep-water exercise would be 
an easier and potentially more efficient means of
producing such an effect, while allowing the 
athlete to decrease stress forces upon the spine 
and lower extremities simultaneously.

Rehab and weight loss 

This latter effect occurs because of the off-
loading effects of buoyancy. At waist-level 
immersion depth, the hips, knees, ankles and 
feet have a 50 percent reduction in loading due 
to buoyancy; at mid-chest depth, there’s a 75 
percent offloading. As a consequence, this effect 
may be used to excellent clinical benefit in 
facilitating recovery from training, or 
rehabilitating from a lower extremity or spine 
injury. The combination of joint offloading, with
the improvement in deep-tissue circulation 
makes the aquatic environment very useful in 
rehabilitation. In fact, even before these effects 
were known, deep-water exercise was used to 
improve racehorse performance without 
exposing the animals to the trauma of the 
racetrack. Owners found they could nearly triple
the expected race career of a horse if they used 
aquatic training for a significant part of the 
workout regimen. In working with Olympic 
distance runners through the Nike development 
program, we tried to have about one-third of the 
training done in water, which seemed to reduce 
injuries as well as improve performance. The 
value of aquatic exercise in patients with osteo-
porosis has been controversial. The aquatic 
environment would be ideal for this group 
because of the frequent coexistence of joint 
disease and the decreased risk of fractures from 
falling during land based exercise. Many such 
patients have a fear of falling that limits their
 tolerance of a land-based walking program, an 
activity that has been shown to build bone 
mineralization and reduce osteoporosis. Most 
studies of aquatic exercise have not shown a 
useful benefit upon bone mineralization, 
however. Studies comparing regular aquatic 
exercisers with regular land-based exercisers 
have shown better bone mineralization in the 
land-based groups at nearly all ages from 
adolescence through senior groups. This does 
not mean that aquatic exercise lacks a place in 
this group of individuals. In my practice, I will 
typically start such a patient in an aquatic
exercise regimen, which has been well shown to
boost lower extremity strength and endurance, 
as well as improve balance. The combination of 
increased strength and balance skills is usually 
sufficient to enable that individual to embark 
upon a walking program safely and begin the 
bone-building process. Another controversial 
point is how aquatic exercise works for obese 
individuals. Because of the offloading produced by buoyancy, the aquatic environment seems ideal, especially in persons with decreased lower extremity strength. It has been shown that aquatic exercise is less efficient in decreasing body fat percentages than land-based programs. Even at Olympic levels of training, these athletes have a higher percentage of body fat than their track athlete peers, as can be seen readily. The swimmers have sculpted 
beautiful bodies with higher percentages of body fat,
whereas the track athletes have greyhoundslim
bodies with very, very low percentages.
Despite this concern, the value of
exercise in obese individuals is absolutely
essential, and aquatics may be a tremendously
useful method of initiating a program
and losing weight over time. While
it may not be as efficient from an absolute
standpoint, it is still effective and likely to
be better sustained because of the lower
risk of joint injury in aquatics for this group.

STRESS RELIEF During immersion, the body sends out a signal to alter the balance of a certain
type of hormone, which creates a balance similar to relaxation or meditation. 

Many of these individuals can participate
successfully for years in a group format, and
I’ve seen people whose lives were totally
changed because of such a program.

On the whole, the response of the human
body to the aquatic environment is profound.
Perhaps it is because all of us spent the initial
formative months of our lives immersed
in a warm-water pool of amniotic fluid that
we can so readily sink into a pool with
relief. Such an environment would provide
protection and the optimum conditions for
growth during this critical period.

But the combined effects of all the properties
of water, from buoyancy through
hydrostatic pressure to its thermal conductive
properties make the aquatic environment
tremendously useful and effective for health
recovery and maintenance, and recreation.

At Washington State University, we are striving 
to create a body of clinically directed 
translational research so that such an
understanding might emerge within the
public, as well as the medical profession.
We’re also trying to create a broader 
understanding of the immense value of aquatics
for high-level athletic training because the
public seems to relate to the effectiveness of
this kind of effort as well.
It is my hope and belief that in the
future, we will see a wetter, happier and
healthier world. ■

WAYS TO BROADEN SUPPORT

FOR AQUATIC HEALTH
■ Broad public awareness campaigns
■ Education within the medical community
■ More active community involvement
■ Legislative advocacy
■ Promotion and dissemination of clinical
research in consumer and medical media.

This diagram shows what’s happening in the body before a person enters the water, and what happens afterward. The changes are significant, especially those involving blood flow and the heart. The deeper a person is immersed, the more the health benefits increase. At neck level, even the brain
is affected because more blood is forced upward from the lower extremities.

PHYSIOLOGY AND IMMERSION

Negative atrial pressure
Negative pleural pressure
Flattened diaphragm
Blood pooled in abdomen,pelvis,and lower
extremities

BEFORE IMMERSION DURING IMMERSION
More venous compression. Heart size
increases 30% and rate slows 20%.
Heart pumps more blood; chest wall is
compressed. Plural pressure increases.
Lungs contain more blood and body
works harder to move air. 
More blood is distributed to kidneys and brain.
The diaphragm is elevated higher during 
inspiration and expiration.
As the water level rises, the abdomen is 
compressed and more blood is forced
upward into the chest cavity.
Pelvis vessel compression occurs.
Venous and lymphatic compression begin
progressively pushing blood upward.

Neck Level

Diaphragm level

This diagram shows what’s happening in the body before a person enters the water, and what happens afterward. The changes are significant, especially those involving blood flow and the heart. The deeper a person is immersed, the more the health benefits increase. At neck level, even the brain is affected because more blood is forced upward from the lower extremities. PHYSIOLOGY AND IMMERSION Negative atrial pressure Negative pleural pressure Flattened diaphragm Blood pooled in abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities BEFORE IMMERSION DURING IMMERSION More venous compression. Heart size increases 30% and rate slows 20%. Heart pumps more blood; chest wall is compressed. Plural pressure increases. Lungs contain more blood and body works harder to move air. More blood is distributed to kidneys and brain. The diaphragm is elevated higher during inspiration and expiration. As the water level rises, the abdomen is compressed and more blood is forced upward into the chest cavity. Pelvis vessel compression occurs. Venous and lymphatic compression begin progressively pushing blood upward. Neck Level Diaphragm level
(CLICK FOR DIAGRAM )

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War

In the light of recent events pertaining to the Tsunami warning off the coast of Japan, we are reposting this I-Book on the Fukushima tragedy, which has been the object of media cover-up and distortion.
Originally published in  January 2012, this study confirms what is now unfolding, a Worldwide process of nuclear radiation.
Note to Readers: Remember to bookmark this page for future reference.
Please Forward the GR I-Book far and wide. Post it on Facebook.
[scroll down for I-BOOK Table of Contents]
Originally published in January 2012. The introduction of the I-Book is contained as a chapter in Michel Chossudovsky’s 2015 bestseller:  The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity,Global Research, Montreal 2015


Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War

The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation

Michel Chossudovsky (Editor)

I-Book No. 3, January 25  2012
Global Research’s Online Interactive I-Book Reader brings together, in the form of chapters, a collection of Global Research feature articles and videos, including debate and analysis, on a broad theme or subject matter. 
In this Interactive Online I-Book we bring to the attention of our readers an important collection of articles, reports and video material on the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe and its impacts (scroll down for the Table of Contents).
INTRODUCTION
The World is at a critical crossroads. The Fukushima disaster in Japan has brought to the forefront the dangers of Worldwide nuclear radiation.
The crisis in Japan has been described as “a nuclear war without a war”. In the words of renowned novelist Haruki Murakami:
“This time no one dropped a bomb on us … We set the stage, we committed the crime with our own hands, we are destroying our own lands, and we are destroying our own lives.”
Nuclear radiation –which threatens life on planet earth– is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities.
While the long-term repercussions of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are yet to be fully assessed, they are far more serious than those pertaining to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, which resulted in almost one million deaths (New Book Concludes – Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer Global Research, September 10, 2010, See also Matthew Penney and Mark Selden  The Severity of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster: Comparing Chernobyl and Fukushima, Global Research, May 25, 2011)
Moreover, while all eyes were riveted on the Fukushima Daiichi plant, news coverage both in Japan and internationally failed to fully acknowledge the impacts of a second catastrophe at TEPCO’s (Tokyo Electric Power Co  Inc) Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant.
The shaky political consensus both in Japan, the U.S. and Western Europe is that the crisis at Fukushima has been contained.
The realties, however, are otherwise. Fukushima 3 was leaking unconfirmed amounts of plutonium. According to Dr. Helen Caldicott, “one millionth of a gram of plutonium, if inhaled can cause cancer”.  
An opinion poll in May 2011 confirmed that more than 80 per cent of the Japanese population do not believe the government’s information regarding the nuclear crisis. (quoted in Sherwood Ross, Fukushima: Japan’s Second Nuclear Disaster, Global Research, November 10, 2011)
The Impacts in Japan
The Japanese government has been obliged to acknowledge that “the severity rating of its nuclear crisis … matches that of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster”. In a bitter irony, however, this tacit admission by the Japanese authorities has proven to been part of  the cover-up of a significantly larger catastrophe, resulting in a process of global nuclear radiation and contamination:
“While Chernobyl was an enormous unprecedented disaster, it only occurred at one reactor and rapidly melted down. Once cooled, it was able to be covered with a concrete sarcophagus that was constructed with 100,000 workers. There are a staggering 4400 tons of nuclear fuel rods at Fukushima, which greatly dwarfs the total size of radiation sources at Chernobyl.” ( Extremely High Radiation Levels in Japan: University Researchers Challenge Official Data, Global Research, April 11, 2011)
Fukushima in the wake of the Tsunami, March 2011
Worldwide Contamination
The dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination. Radioactive elements have not only been detected in the food chain in Japan, radioactive rain water has been recorded in California:
“Hazardous radioactive elements being released in the sea and air around Fukushima accumulate at each step of various food chains (for example, into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow’s meat and milk, then humans). Entering the body, these elements – called internal emitters – migrate to specific organs such as the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, continuously irradiating small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many years often induce cancer”. (Helen Caldicott, Fukushima: Nuclear Apologists Play Shoot the Messenger on Radiation, The Age,  April 26, 2011)
While the spread of radiation to the West Coast of North America was casually acknowledged, the early press reports (AP and Reuters) “quoting diplomatic sources” stated that only “tiny amounts of radioactive particles have arrived in California but do not pose a threat to human health.”
“According to the news agencies, the unnamed sources have access to data from a network of measuring stations run by the United Nations’ Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization. …
… Greg Jaczko, chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, told White House reporters on Thursday (March 17) that his experts “don’t see any concern from radiation levels that could be harmful here in the United States or any of the U.S. territories”.


The spread of radiation. March 2011
Public Health Disaster. Economic Impacts
What prevails is a well organized camouflage. The public health disaster in Japan, the contamination of water, agricultural land and the food chain, not to mention the broader economic and social implications, have neither been fully acknowledged nor addressed in a comprehensive and meaningful fashion by the Japanese authorities.
Japan as a nation state has been destroyed. Its landmass and territorial waters are contaminated. Part of the country is uninhabitable. High levels of radiation have been recorded in the Tokyo metropolitan area, which has a population of  39 million (2010) (more than the population of Canada, circa 34 million (2010)) There are indications that the food chain is contaminated throughout Japan:
Radioactive cesium exceeding the legal limit was detected in tea made in a factory in Shizuoka City, more than 300 kilometers away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Shizuoka Prefecture is one of the most famous tea producing areas in Japan.
A tea distributor in Tokyo reported to the prefecture that it detected high levels of radioactivity in the tea shipped from the city. The prefecture ordered the factory to refrain from shipping out the product. After the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, radioactive contamination of tea leaves and processed tea has been found over a wide area around Tokyo. (See 5 More Companies Detect Radiation In Their Tea Above Legal Limits Over 300 KM From Fukushima, June 15, 2011)
Japan’s industrial and manufacturing base is prostrate. Japan is no longer a leading industrial power. The country’s exports have plummeted. The Tokyo government has announced its first trade deficit since 1980.
While the business media has narrowly centered on the impacts of power outages and energy shortages on the pace of productive activity, the broader issue pertaining to the outright radioactive contamination of the country’s infrastructure and industrial base is a “scientific taboo” (i.e the radiation of industrial plants, machinery and equipment, buildings, roads, etc). A report released in January 2012 points to the nuclear contamination of building materials used in the construction industry, in cluding roads and residential buildings throughout Japan.(See  FUKUSHIMA: Radioactive Houses and Roads in Japan. Radioactive Building Materials Sold to over 200 Construction Companies, January 2012)
A “coverup report” by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (May 2011), entitled “Economic Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Current Status of Recovery“  presents “Economic Recovery” as a fait accompli. It also brushes aside the issue of radiation. The impacts of nuclear radiation on the work force and the country’s industrial base are not mentioned. The report states that the distance between Tokyo -Fukushima Dai-ichi  is of the order of 230 km (about 144 miles) and that the levels of radiation in Tokyo are lower than in Hong Kong and New York City.(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Current Status of Recovery, p.15). This statement is made without corroborating evidence and in overt contradiction with independent radiation readings in Tokyo (se map below). In recent developments, Sohgo Security Services Co. is launching a lucrative “radiation measurement service targeting households in Tokyo and four surrounding prefectures”.
“A map of citizens’ measured radiation levels shows radioactivity is distributed in a complex pattern reflecting the mountainous terrain and the shifting winds across a broad area of Japan north of Tokyo which is in the center of the of bottom of the map.”
“Radiation limits begin to be exceeded at just above 0.1 microsieverts/ hour blue. Red is about fifty times the civilian radiation limit at 5.0 microsieverts/hour. Because children are much more sensitive than adults, these results are a great concern for parents of young children in potentially affected areas.”
The fundamental question is whether the vast array of industrial goods and components “Made in Japan” — including hi tech components, machinery, electronics, motor vehicles, etc — and exported Worldwide are contaminated? Were this to be the case, the entire East and Southeast Asian industrial base –which depends heavily on Japanese components and industrial technology– would be affected. The potential impacts on international trade would be farreaching. In this regard, in January, Russian officials confiscated irradiated Japanese automobiles and autoparts in the port of Vladivostok for sale in the Russian Federation. Needless to say, incidents of this nature in a global competitive environment, could lead to the demise of the Japanese automobile industry which is already in crisis.
While most of the automotive industry is in central Japan, Nissan’s engine factory in Iwaki city is 42 km from the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Is the Nissan work force affected? Is the engine plant contaminated? The plant is within about 10 to 20 km of the government’s “evacuation zone” from which some 200,000 people were evacuated (see map below).
Nuclear Energy and Nuclear War
The crisis in Japan has also brought into the open the unspoken relationship between nuclear energy and nuclear war.
Nuclear energy is not a civilian economic activity. It is an appendage of the nuclear weapons industry which is controlled by the so-called defense contractors. The powerful corporate interests behind nuclear energy and nuclear weapons overlap.
In Japan at the height of the disaster, “the nuclear industry and government agencies [were] scrambling to prevent the discovery of atomic-bomb research facilities hidden inside Japan’s civilian nuclear power plants”.1  (See Yoichi Shimatsu, Secret Weapons Program Inside Fukushima Nuclear Plant? Global Research,  April 12, 2011)
It should be noted that the complacency of both the media and the governments to the hazards of nuclear radiation pertains to the nuclear energy industry as well as to to use of nuclear weapons. In both cases, the devastating health impacts of nuclear radiation are casually denied. Tactical nuclear weapons with an explosive capacity of up to six times a Hiroshima bomb are labelled by the Pentagon as “safe for the surrounding civilian population”.
No concern has been expressed at the political level as to the likely consequences of a US-NATO-Israel attack on Iran, using “safe for civilians” tactical nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state.
Such an action would result in “the unthinkable”: a nuclear holocaust over a large part of the Middle East and Central Asia. A nuclear nightmare, however, would occur even if nuclear weapons were not used. The bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities using conventional weapons would contribute to unleashing another Fukushima type disaster with extensive radioactive fallout. (For further details See Michel Chossudovsky, Towards a World War III Scenario, The Dangers of Nuclear War, Global Research, Montreal, 2011)
The Online Interactive I-Book Reader on Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War
In view of the official cover-up and media disinformation campaign, the contents of the articles and video reports in this Online Interactive Reader have not trickled down to to the broader public. (See Table of contents below)
This Online Interactive Reader on Fukushima contains a combination of analytical and scientific articles, video reports as well as shorter news reports and corroborating data.
Part I focusses on The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: How it Happened? Part II  pertains to The Devastating Health and Social Impacts in Japan. Part III  centers on the “Hidden Nuclear Catastrophe”, namely the cover-up by the Japanese government and the corporate media. Part IVfocusses on the issue of  Worlwide Nuclear Radiation and Part V reviews the Implications of the Fukushima disaster for the Global Nuclear Energy Industry.
In the face of ceaseless media disinformation, this Global Research Online I-Book on the dangers of global nuclear radiation is intended to break the media vacuum and raise public awareness, while also pointing to the complicity of  the governments, the media and the nuclear industry.
We call upon our readers to spread the word.
We invite university, college and high school teachers to make this Interactive Reader on Fukushima available to their students.

Michel Chossudovsky, January 25, 2012
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: How it Happened
Nuclear Apocalypse in Japan
Lifting the Veil of Nuclear Catastrophe and cover-up
- by Keith Harmon Snow – 2011-03-18
Humanity now faces a deadly serious challenge coming out of Japan — the epicenter of radiation.
VIDEO: Full Meltdown? Japan Maximum Nuclear Alert
Watch now on GRTV
-by Christopher Busby- 2011-03-30
- by Sherwood Ross – 2011-11-10
Secret Weapons Program Inside Fukushima Nuclear Plant?
U.S.-Japan security treaty fatally delayed nuclear workers’ fight against meltdown
- by Yoichi Shimatsu – 2011-04-12
The specter of self-destruction can be ended only with the abrogation of the U.S.-Japan security treaty, the root cause of the secrecy that fatally delayed the nuclear workers’ fight against meltdown.
Fukushima: “China Syndrome Is Inevitable” … “Huge Steam Explosions”
“Massive Hydrovolcanic Explosion” or a “Nuclear Bomb-Type Explosion” May Occur
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-11-22
- by Washington’s Blog – 2012-01-12
VIDEO: New TEPCO Photographs Substantiate Significant Damage to Fukushima Unit 3
Latest report now on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2011-10-20
PART II
The Devastating Health and Social Impacts in Japan
VIDEO: Surviving Japan: A Critical Look at the Nuclear Crisis
Learn more about this important new documentary on GRTV
- by Chris Noland – 2012-01-23
Fukushima and the Battle for Truth
Large sectors of the Japanese population are accumulating significant levels of internal contamination
- by Paul Zimmerman – 2011-09-27
FUKUSHIMA: Public health Fallout from Japanese Quake
“Culture of cover-up” and inadequate cleanup. Japanese people exposed to “unconscionable” health risks
- by Canadian Medical Association Journal – 2011-12-30
- 2012-01-16
VIDEO: Cancer Risk To Young Children Near Fukushima Daiichi Underestimated
Watch this important new report on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2012-01-19
VIDEO: The Results Are In: Japan Received Enormous Exposures of Radiation from Fukushima
Important new video now on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen, Marco Kaltofen – 2011-11-07
- by Jim Bartel – 2011-10-31
- by Prof. Matthew Penney, Prof. Mark Selden – 2011-05-24
Uncertainty about the long-term health effects of radiation
Tokyo Water Unsafe For Babies, Food Bans Imposed – by Karyn Poupee – 2011-03-23

PART III
Hidden Nuclear Catastrophe: Cover-up by the Japanese Government and the Corporate Media
VIDEO: Japanese Government Insiders Reveal Fukushima Secrets
GRTV Behind the Headlines now online
- by James Corbett – 2011-10-06
Fukushima and the Mass Media Meltdown
The Repercussions of a Pro-Nuclear Corporate Press
- by Keith Harmon Snow – 2011-06-20
- by Alexander Higgins – 2011-04-18
The tendency to deny systemic errors – “in order to avoid public panic” – is rooted in the determination of an entrenched Japanese bureaucracy to protect itself…
“The nuclear industry is waging a war against humanity.” This war has now entered an endgame which will decide the survival of the human race.
Engineers Knew Fukushima Might Be Unsafe, But Covered It Up … 
And Now the Extreme Vulnerabilty of NEW U.S. Plants Is Being Covered Up
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-11-12
COVERUP: Are Fukushima Reactors 5 and 6 In Trouble Also?
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-11-14
- by John LaForge – 2012-01-17
PART IV
The Process of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation
- by Dr. Helen Caldicott – 2012-01-25
In the US, Following the Fukushima fallout, samples of radioactivity in precipitation, air, water, and milk, taken by the U.S. government, showed levels hundreds of times above normal…
Radioactive Dust From Japan Hit North America 3 Days After Meltdown 
But Governments “Lied” About Meltdowns and Radiation
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-06-24
VIDEO: Fukushima Will Be Radiating Everyone for Centuries
New report now on GRTV
- by Michio Kaku, Liz Hayes – 2011-08-23
- 2011-12-29
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-11-15
PART V
Implications for the Global Nuclear Energy Industry

- by Helen Caldicott – 2011-12-05
VIDEO: Radiation Coverups Confirmed: Los Alamos, Fort Calhoun, Fukushima, TSA
New Sunday Report now on GRTV
- by James Corbett – 2011-07-04
VIDEO: Why Fukushima Can Happen Here: What the NRC and Nuclear Industry Don’t Want You to Know
Watch now on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen, David Lochbaum – 2011-07-12
VIDEO: Safety Problems in all Reactors Designed Like Fukushima
Learn more on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2011-09-26
VIDEO: Proper Regulation of Nuclear Power has been Coopted Worldwide
Explore the issues on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2011-10-05
VIDEO: New Nuclear Reactors Do Not Consider Fukushima Design Flaws
Find out more on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2011-11-24
Nuclear Energy: Profit Driven Industry
“Nuclear Can Be Safe Or It Can Be Cheap … But It Can’t Be Both”
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-12-23
VIDEO: Fukushima and the Fall of the Nuclear Priesthood
Watch the new GRTV Feature Interview
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2011-10-22
- by Patrick Henningsen – 2011-06-23
- by Sue Sturgis – 2011-07-24
- by Rady Ananda – 2011-07-01
VIDEO: US vs Japan: The Threat of Radiation Speculation
Dangerous double standards examined on GRTV
- by Arnie Gundersen – 2011-06-25
Additional articles and videos on Fukushima and Nuclear Radiation are available at Global Research’s Dossier on The Environment

TEXT BOX
 Nuclear Radiation: Categorization
At Fukushima, reports confirm that alpha, beta, gamma particles and neutrons have been released:
“While non-ionizing radiation and x-rays are a result of electron transitions in atoms or molecules, there are three forms of ionizing radiation that are a result of activity within the nucleus of an atom.  These forms of nuclear radiation are alpha particles (α-particles), beta particles (β-particles) and gamma rays (γ-rays).
Alpha particles are heavy positively charged particles made up of two protons and two neutrons.  They are essentially a helium nucleus and are thus represented in a nuclear equation by either α or .  See the Alpha Decay page for more information on alpha particles.
Beta particles come in two forms:  and .  particles are just electrons that have been ejected from the nucleus.  This is a result of sub-nuclear reactions that result in a neutron decaying to a proton.  The electron is needed to conserve charge and comes from the nucleus.  It is not an orbital electron.  particles are positrons ejected from the nucleus when a proton decays to a neutron.  A positron is an anti-particle that is similar in nearly all respects to an electron, but has a positive charge.  See the Beta Decay page for more information on beta particles.
Gamma rays are photons of high energy electromagnetic radiation (light).  Gamma rays generally have the highest frequency and shortest wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum.  There is some overlap in the frequencies of gamma rays and x-rays; however, x-rays are formed from electron transitions while gamma rays are formed from nuclear transitions. See the Gamma Rays  for more” (SOURCE: Canadian Nuclear Association)
“A neutron is a particle that is found in the nucleus, or center, of atoms. It has a mass very close to protons, which also reside in the nucleus of atoms. Together, they make up almost all of the mass of individual atoms. Each has a mass of about 1 amu, which is roughly 1.6×10-27kg. Protons have a positive charge and neutrons have no charge, which is why they were more difficult to discover.” (SOURCE: Neutron Radiation)

“Many different radioactive isotopes are used in or are produced by nuclear reactors. The most important of these are described below:
1. Uranium 235 (U-235) is the active component of most nuclear reactor fuel.
2. Plutonium (Pu-239) is a key nuclear material used in modern nuclear weapons and is also present as a by-product in certain reprocessed fuels used in some nuclear reactors. Pu-239 is also produced in uranium reactors as a byproduct of fission of U-235.
3. Cesium (Cs-137 ) is a fission product of U-235. It emits beta and gamma radiationand can cause radiation sickness and death if exposures are high enough. …
4. Iodine 131 (I-131), also a fission product of U-235, emits beta and gamma radiation. After inhalation or ingestion, it is absorbed by and concentrated in the thyroid gland, where its beta radiation damages nearby thyroid tissue  (SOURCE: Amesh A. Adalja, MD, Eric S. Toner, MD, Anita Cicero, JD, Joseph Fitzgerald, MS, MPH, and Thomas V. Inglesby MD, Radiation at Fukushima: Basic Issues and Concepts, March 31, 2011)

Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (Emeritus) at the University of Ottawa. He is the Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal and Editor of the globalresearch.ca website. He is the author of The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003) and America’s “War on Terrorism”(2005). His most recent book is entitled Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War (2011). He has taught as Visiting Professor at universities in Western Europe, South East Asia, Latin America and The Pacific, acted as adviser to governments of developing countries and as a consultant to several international organizations. Prof. Chossudovsky is a signatory of the Kuala Lumpur declaration to criminalize war and recipient of the Human Rights Prize of the Society for the Protection of Civil Rights and Human Dignity (GBM), Berlin, Germany. He is also a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages.
Spread the word, reverse the tide of war, forward the N-Book to friends and family, post on facebook.
We call upon college, university and high school teachers to bring this I-Book to the attention of their students.
The Online News Reader Series is provided free of charge to our readers.
Any amount large or small will contribute to supporting our endeavors.