In the chaos of the past year we’ve found ourselves—one of us a physician and poet, the other a professor of literature and filmmaker—drawn to the alchemy of language as a way to make sense of what’s happening in our medical centers, our communities, and the world. Here we present 3 poems we recommend for their wisdom and the hope they inspire as we witness the loss, suffering, and resilience brought about by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
“One Art,” by Elizabeth Bishop
The art of losing isn’t hard to master;
so many things seem filled with the intent
to be lost that their loss is no disaster.
Lose something every day. Accept the fluster
of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.
Then practice losing farther, losing faster:
places, and names, and where it was you meant
to travel. None of these will bring disaster.
I lost my mother’s watch. And look! my last, or
next-to-last, of three loved houses went.
The art of losing isn’t hard to master.
I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster,
some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
I miss them, but it wasn’t a disaster.
—Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
I love) I shan’t have lied. It’s evident
the art of losing’s not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.
“The art of losing isn’t hard to master” begins perhaps the most famous poem by esteemed American poet Elizabeth Bishop: “so many things seem filled with the intent to be lost that their loss is no disaster” (Video 1).
The poem goes on to matter-of-factly index losses: keys, time, names, and much more. With loss all around in this first year of COVID-19—our patients, our colleagues, our loved ones, our bearings—“One Art” seems apt for our time. Written in the 1970s, the poem recalls a lifetime of losses the poet suffered and her struggles with alcoholism. The poem builds out similar lines with slight variation, a gesture toward containment, as though the losses it catalogs might thus be structured, placed under some control. It is written in iambs, a steady rhythmic heartbeat that can be comforting. If we must lose something or everything dear to us, the form implies, we can let go with equanimity and some grace, not unlike an algorithm that organizes a treatment plan as a patient deteriorates. Loss, for certain, but not all is lost.
The end-rhymes repeatedly chant “master/disaster, master/disaster,” creating a baseline of reassurance and the dialectic of a psyche finding its way through loss. But the aspiration to mastery leaves room for a lot of anxiety. Many readers hear a kind of hysteria in the poem, with its rhythm revving up as it ruminates on vulnerability in the face of mortal threat, an expression of obsessive thinking similar to what many have been experiencing as we worry about PPE supplies, school reopenings, vaccine safety, and whether we might be exposed to the novel coronavirus.
How we can respond to loss is reflected in the poem’s last line
…It's evident
the art of losing's not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster
in which the speaker forces herself and exhorts others to “Write it!”, to summon language, when she well knows no words will suffice. This paradox of needing the writing and knowing it is always insufficient is itself an ironic loss, made all the more poignant as we read Bishop, a poet of singular eloquence, wrenching herself out of this paradox. Like an order barked out during a futile code, “Write it!” reminds us in medicine of not just our brave attempts to sustain life in the face of COVID-19’s grave physiologic injury, but also what we might still have to offer even after our best efforts fall short.
No comments:
Post a Comment