Friday, March 19, 2021

How Many Cells Are In Your Body?

 Do You Replenish Enough Water Daily For Your Body Weight?


Your weight in kg now drink (Daily Rate, ml) :


1 kg (32.53)

9 kg (292.77)

10 kg (325.3)

15 kg (487.95)

18 kg (585.54)

20 kg (650.6)

26 kg (845.78)

27 kg (878.31)

31 kg (1008.43)

36 kg (1171.08)

42 kg (1366.26)

45 kg (1463.85)

53 kg (1724.09)

54 kg (1756.62)

60 kg (1951.8)

63 kg (2049.39)

66 kg (2146.98)

72 kg (2342.16)

74 kg (2407.22)

81 kg (2634.93)

85 kg (2765.05)

90 kg (2927.7)

99 kg (3220.47)

108 kg (3513.24)

117 kg (3806.01)

126 kg (4098.78)

135 kg (4391.55)


Dosage is 10% of your daily rate, every 90 minutes interval.


Neither under drink nor over drink, just drink enough water on time , every TIME... WATER CURES.

Ask for Water Cure Protocol Formula...

Each cell needs water, on daily basis for it's survivability. And each millilitre of water shortchanged over time, leads to water deficit within, in turn lead to cellular dehydration, which manifests various signs and symptoms. 

The mean weight of a cell is 1 nanogram. 1 kilogram is equal to 1000000000000 nanogram . 

 For one adult person weighing 70 kilograms, simple arithmetic would lead us to conclude that that man has 70 trillion cells.

How Many Cells Are In Your Body?

A simple question deserves a simple answer. How many cells are in your body?

Unfortunately, your cells can’t fill out census forms, so they can’t tell you themselves. And while it’s easy enough to look through a microscope and count off certain types of cells, this method isn’t practical either. Some types of cells are easy to spot, while others–such as tangled neurons–weave themselves up into obscurity. Even if you could count ten cells each second, it would take you tens of thousands of years to finish counting. Plus, there would be certain logistical problems you’d encounter along the way to counting all the cells in your body–for example, chopping your own body up into tiny patches for microscopic viewing.

For now, the best we can hope for is a study published recenty in Annals of Human Biology, entitled, with admirable clarity, “An Estimation of the Number of Cells in the Human Body.”

The authors–a team of scientists from Italy, Greece, and Spain–admit that they’re hardly the first people to tackle this question. They looked back over scientific journals and books from the past couple centuries and found many estimates. But those estimates sprawled over a huge range, from 5 billion to 200 million trillion cells. And practically none of scientists who offered those numbers provided an explanation for how they came up with them. Clearly, this is a subject ripe for research.

If scientists can’t count all the cells in a human body, how can they estimate it? The mean weight of a cell is 1 nanogram. For an adult man weighing 70 kilograms, simple arithmetic would lead us to conclude that that man has 70 trillion cells.

On the other hand, it’s also possible to do this calculation based on the volume of cells. The mean volume of a mammal cell is estimated to be 4 billionths of a cubic centimeter. (To get a sense of that size, check  out The Scale of the Universe.) Based on an adult man’s typical volume, you might conclude that the human body contains 15 trillion cells.

So if you pick volume or weight, you get drastically different numbers. Making matters worse, our bodies are not packed with cells in a uniform way, like a jar full of jellybeans. Cells come in different sizes, and they grow in different densities. Look at a beaker of blood, for example, and you’ll find that the red blood cells are packed tight. If you used their density to estimate the cells in a human body, you’d come to a staggering 724 trillion cells. Skin cells, on the other hand, are so sparse that they’d give you a paltry estimate of 35 billion cells.

So the author of the new paper set out to estimate the number of cells in the body the hard way, breaking it down by organs and cell types. (They didn’t try counting up all the microbes that also call our body home, sticking only to human cells.) They’ve scoured the scientific literature for details on the volume and density of cells in gallbladders, knee joints, intestines, bone marrow, and many other tissues. They then came up with estimates for the total number of each kind of cell. They estimate, for example, that we have 50 billion fat cells and 2 billion heart muscle cells.

Adding up all their numbers, the scientists came up with … drumroll … 37.2 trillion cells.

This is not a final number, but it’s a very good start. While it’s true that people may vary in size–and thus vary in their number of cells–adult humans don’t vary by orders of magnitude except in the movies. The scientists declare with great confidence that the common estimate of a trillion cells in the human body is wrong. But they see their estimate as an opportunity for a collaboration–perhaps through an online database assembled by many experts on many different body parts–to zero in on a better estimate.

Curiosity is justification enough to ponder how many cells the human body contains, but there can also be scientific benefits to pinning down the number too. Scientists are learning about the human body by building sophisticated computer models of lungs and hearts and other organs. If these models have ten times too many cells as real organs do, their results may veer wildly off the mark.

The number of cells in an organ also has bearing on some medical conditions. The authors of the new study find that a healthy liver has 240 billion cells in it, for example, but some studies on cirrhosis have found the disease organ have as few as 172 billion.

Perhaps most importantly, the very fact that some 34 trillion cells can cooperate for decades, giving rise to a single human body instead of a chaotic war of selfish microbes, is amazing. The evolution of even a basic level of multicellularity is remarkable enough. But our ancestors went way beyond a simple sponge-like anatomy, evolving a vast collective made of many different types. To understand that collective on a deep level, we need to know how big it really is.

No comments: