UK will not pay out over slavery, says Reeves
Rachel Reeves echoed comments by the prime minister, saying that there needed to be a focus on the present and not the past
The UK is "not going to be paying out" reparations for the transatlantic slave trade, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told the BBC.
Her comments come as diplomatic sources told the BBC that the Commonwealth heads of government are preparing to begin a "meaningful conversation" about an issue which could potentially mean the UK owing billions of pounds.
The chancellor said she understood why Commonwealth leaders would be making such demands, but it was not something the UK government would commit to.
UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who is attending the summit, said he wanted to discuss current challenges, especially climate change, rather than issues of the past.
"That's where I'm going to put my focus - rather than what will end up being very, very long endless discussions about reparations," he said.
“Of course slavery is abhorrent to everybody; the trade and the practice, there's no question about that. But I think from my point of view… I'd rather roll up my sleeves and work... on the current future-facing challenges.”
No UK apology over slavery at Commonwealth summit
The chancellor reiterated that message in an interview with the BBC, saying: "We’re not going to be paying out the reparations that some countries are speaking about.
"I understand why they make those demands but that’s not something that this government is doing."
Commonwealth leaders at the Samoa summit are expected to defy the UK and debate ways of securing reparations for historical slavery. At its height, Britain was the world's biggest slave-trading nation.
Downing Street insists the issue is not on the agenda for the summit of 56 Commonwealth countries.
King Charles is in Samoa for a four-day visit and is due to formally open the summit later with a speech paying tribute to his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, and the role the Commonwealth played in her life.
The King will say how "all nations are equal in this unique and voluntary association" which "is committed to developing free and democratic societies", and will also speak of the "existential threat" of climate change and its impact on Commonwealth nations.
He will say that the Commonwealth, thanks to its scale and diversity - representing a third of humanity - can "discuss the most challenging issues with openness and respect", and also speak to the importance of recognising and understanding the path of history, and where that may have given rise to contemporary challenges.
What form could reparations for slavery take?
In the run-up to this year's summit, there have been growing calls from Commonwealth leaders for the UK to apologise and make reparations worth for the country’s historic role in the slave trade.
A report published last year by the University of West Indies - backed by Patrick Robinson, a judge who sits on the International Court of Justice - concluded the UK owed more than £18tn in reparations for its role in slavery in 14 Caribbean countries.
Frederick Mitchell, foreign minister of the Bahamas, believes the UK could change its stance and he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: “Once you broach the subject it may take a while for people to come around but come around they will."
Reparatory justice for slavery can come in many forms, including financial reparations, debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, building museums, economic support, and public health assistance.
On a visit to Kenya last year, the King expressed the "greatest sorrow and regret" over the "wrongdoings" of the colonial era, but stopped short of issuing an apology, which would have required the agreement of ministers.
Mr Mitchell told the Commonwealth gathering: "It’s a simple matter – it can be done, one sentence, one line."
He said to the BBC: "The word is apologise, that’s the word."
Asked how much reparations should amount to, he said it was not just a matter of money but of “respect, acknowledging the past was a wrong that needs to be corrected”.
He said member countries "want the conversation to start" but "there appears to be even a reluctance to have the conversation".
Earlier, a UK government spokesperson said: “Reparations are not on the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting. The government’s position has not changed – we do not pay reparations.
"We are focused on using the summit at [the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting] to discuss the shared opportunities which we can unlock across the Commonwealth – including securing more economic growth.”
It is understood the Downing Street position – that reparatory justice is not on the agenda – while technically correct, has angered some Caribbean ministers when it was obvious the issue would be discussed at the summit.
Some non-Caribbean countries are not unsympathetic towards the British position and want the summit to focus more on existing challenges - such as climate change, which is adversely affecting many Commonwealth countries, about half of whom are small island states.
But all three candidates hoping to be elected this weekend as the next secretary general of the Commonwealth - Shirley Botchwey of Ghana, Joshua Setipa of Lesotho and Mamadou Tangara of Gambia - have made clear they support reparatory justice.
Commonwealth heads of government are preparing to defy the United Kingdom and agree plans to examine reparatory justice for the transatlantic slave trade, the BBC has learned.
Downing Street insists the issue is not on the agenda for the summit of 56 Commonwealth countries, which begins in the Pacific island nation of Samoa on Friday.
But diplomatic sources said officials were negotiating an agreement to conduct further research and begin a “meaningful conversation” about an issue which could potentially leave the UK owing billions of pounds in reparations.
Frederick Mitchell, foreign minister of the Bahamas, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: “Once you broach the subject it may take a while for people to come around but come around they will."
Reparatory justice for slavery can come in many forms, including financial reparations, debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, building museums, economic support, and public health assistance.
The current text of the draft summit communique – made known to the BBC – says: “Heads, noting calls for discussions on reparatory justice with regard to the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel enslavement… agreed that the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity.”
It says the heads of government would play “an active role in bringing about such inclusive conversations addressing these harms” and that they agreed “to prioritise and facilitate further and additional research on the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel slavery that encourages and supports the conversations and informs a way forward”.
The text – which could still change once Commonwealth leaders arrive – has been hammered out by diplomats ahead of the summit. British officials succeeded in blocking a plan for an entirely separate declaration on the subject.
The UK did not want any language in the communique about reparatory justice, but at the moment it is having to accept it will include three full paragraphs setting out the Commonwealth’s detailed position.
Officials from Caricom, the body that represents Caribbean countries, have sought to broaden the issue so that it encompasses not just the slave trade across the Atlantic but also the Pacific.
The draft communique says a majority of member states “share common historical experiences in relation to this abhorrent trade, chattel enslavement, the debilitation and dispossession of indigenous people”.
It also refers directly to practices known as “blackbirding”, where Pacific islanders were tricked or kidnapped into slave or cheap labour in colonies throughout the region.
Diplomats said the expectation now was that reparatory justice would be a central focus of the agenda for the next Commonwealth summit in two years’ time in the Caribbean, possibly Antigua and Barbuda.
In the run-up to this year's summit, there have been growing calls from Commonwealth leaders for the UK to apologise and make reparations worth trillions of pounds for the country’s historic role in the slave trade.
A report published last year by the University of West Indies - backed by Patrick Robinson, a judge who sits on the International Court of Justice - concluded the UK owed more than £18tn in reparations for its role in slavery in 14 Caribbean countries.
King Charles III during a visit to O Le Pupu'Pue National Park, Sa'agafou on the island of Upolu, to meet local villagers and community groups involved in the reforestation efforts on day five of the royal visit to Australia and Samoa.
Ahead of the Commonwealth meeting, King Charles met locals involved in reforestation efforts on Samoa and attended a ceremony in which he was made an honorary chieftain
Britain's Queen Camilla and Commonwealth Secretary-General, Baroness Scotland of Asthal attend the CHOGM Women's Forum Side Event
Queen Camilla attended a womens' forum event hosted by Commonwealth Secretary-General Baroness Scotland of Asthal in Samoa
Last weekend the prime minister of the Bahamas, Philip Davis, used a visit by Foreign Office minister Baroness Chapman to tell her the fight for reparations was far from over.
Bahamas foreign minister Frederick Mitchell told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The word is apologise, that’s the word."
He said for the Commonwealth gathering, "it’s a simple matter – it can be done, one sentence, one line."
Asked how much reparations should amount to, Mr Mitchell said it was not just a matter of money but of “respect, acknowledging the past was a wrong that needs to be corrected”.
He said member countries "want the conversation to start" but "there appears to be even a reluctance to have the conversation".
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the UK had heard calls for slavery reparations "loud and clear" but that prime minister was "right" to "focus on the future".
A UK government spokesperson said they would not comment on the leak to the BBC, but added: “Reparations are not on the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting. The government’s position has not changed – we do not pay reparations.
"We are focused on using the summit at [the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting] to discuss the shared opportunities which we can unlock across the Commonwealth – including securing more economic growth.”
It is understood the Downing Street position – that reparatory justice is not on the agenda – while technically correct, has angered some Caribbean ministers when it was obvious the issue would be discussed at the summit.
The BBC understands that the tenor and tone of language from the UK government has contributed to "irritating even more" some members who might not have expected the UK to change its view and "suddenly start shelling out a lot of money".
Sir Keir Starmer landed in Samoa late on Wednesday UK time, becoming the first sitting prime minister to visit a Pacific island nation.
Speaking to reporters en route, he said he wanted to discuss current challenges with Commonwealth leaders, especially climate change, rather than issues of the past.
“What they're most interested in is, can we help them working with, for example, international financial institutions on the sorts of packages they need right now in relation to the challenges they're facing," he said.
"That's where I'm going to put my focus - rather than what will end up being very, very long endless discussions about reparations on the past.
“Of course, slavery is abhorrent to everybody; the trade and the practice, there's no question about that. But I think from my point of view… I'd rather roll up my sleeves and work with them on the current future-facing challenges than spend a lot of time on the past.”
Commonwealth heads of government are preparing to defy the United Kingdom and agree plans to examine reparatory justice for the transatlantic slave trade, the BBC has learned.
Downing Street insists the issue is not on the agenda for the summit of 56 Commonwealth countries, which begins in the Pacific island nation of Samoa on Friday.
But diplomatic sources said officials were negotiating an agreement to conduct further research and begin a “meaningful conversation” about an issue which could potentially leave the UK owing billions of pounds in reparations.
Frederick Mitchell, foreign minister of the Bahamas, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: “Once you broach the subject it may take a while for people to come around but come around they will."
Reparatory justice for slavery can come in many forms, including financial reparations, debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, building museums, economic support, and public health assistance.
The current text of the draft summit communique – made known to the BBC – says: “Heads, noting calls for discussions on reparatory justice with regard to the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel enslavement… agreed that the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity.”
It says the heads of government would play “an active role in bringing about such inclusive conversations addressing these harms” and that they agreed “to prioritise and facilitate further and additional research on the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel slavery that encourages and supports the conversations and informs a way forward”.
The text – which could still change once Commonwealth leaders arrive – has been hammered out by diplomats ahead of the summit. British officials succeeded in blocking a plan for an entirely separate declaration on the subject.
The UK did not want any language in the communique about reparatory justice, but at the moment it is having to accept it will include three full paragraphs setting out the Commonwealth’s detailed position.
Officials from Caricom, the body that represents Caribbean countries, have sought to broaden the issue so that it encompasses not just the slave trade across the Atlantic but also the Pacific.
The draft communique says a majority of member states “share common historical experiences in relation to this abhorrent trade, chattel enslavement, the debilitation and dispossession of indigenous people”.
It also refers directly to practices known as “blackbirding”, where Pacific islanders were tricked or kidnapped into slave or cheap labour in colonies throughout the region.
Diplomats said the expectation now was that reparatory justice would be a central focus of the agenda for the next Commonwealth summit in two years’ time in the Caribbean, possibly Antigua and Barbuda.
In the run-up to this year's summit, there have been growing calls from Commonwealth leaders for the UK to apologise and make reparations worth trillions of pounds for the country’s historic role in the slave trade.
A report published last year by the University of West Indies - backed by Patrick Robinson, a judge who sits on the International Court of Justice - concluded the UK owed more than £18tn in reparations for its role in slavery in 14 Caribbean countries.
Last weekend the prime minister of the Bahamas, Philip Davis, used a visit by Foreign Office minister Baroness Chapman to tell her the fight for reparations was far from over.
Bahamas foreign minister Frederick Mitchell told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The word is apologise, that’s the word."
He said for the Commonwealth gathering, "it’s a simple matter – it can be done, one sentence, one line."
Asked how much reparations should amount to, Mr Mitchell said it was not just a matter of money but of “respect, acknowledging the past was a wrong that needs to be corrected”.
He said member countries "want the conversation to start" but "there appears to be even a reluctance to have the conversation".
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the UK had heard calls for slavery reparations "loud and clear" but that prime minister was "right" to "focus on the future".
A UK government spokesperson said they would not comment on the leak to the BBC, but added: “Reparations are not on the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting. The government’s position has not changed – we do not pay reparations.
"We are focused on using the summit at [the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting] to discuss the shared opportunities which we can unlock across the Commonwealth – including securing more economic growth.”
It is understood the Downing Street position – that reparatory justice is not on the agenda – while technically correct, has angered some Caribbean ministers when it was obvious the issue would be discussed at the summit.
The BBC understands that the tenor and tone of language from the UK government has contributed to "irritating even more" some members who might not have expected the UK to change its view and "suddenly start shelling out a lot of money".
Sir Keir Starmer landed in Samoa late on Wednesday UK time, becoming the first sitting prime minister to visit a Pacific island nation.
Speaking to reporters en route, he said he wanted to discuss current challenges with Commonwealth leaders, especially climate change, rather than issues of the past.
“What they're most interested in is, can we help them working with, for example, international financial institutions on the sorts of packages they need right now in relation to the challenges they're facing," he said.
"That's where I'm going to put my focus - rather than what will end up being very, very long endless discussions about reparations on the past.
“Of course, slavery is abhorrent to everybody; the trade and the practice, there's no question about that. But I think from my point of view… I'd rather roll up my sleeves and work with them on the current future-facing challenges than spend a lot of time on the past.”
Calls for the UK to provide reparations for its historical role in the slave trade have reignited ahead of a meeting of Commonwealth countries on Friday.
While Sir Keir Starmer said reparatory justice would not be on the agenda, Commonwealth leaders have defied the prime minister and plan to move towards a "meaningful conversation" on the issue.
The UK has long faced calls to provide reparations for its role in the Atlantic slave trade which saw millions of Africans enslaved and forced to work, largely on plantations in the Caribbean and Americas.
The chancellor told the BBC the UK would not be "paying out" reparations - but might there be other forms of reparations to consider, and how likely is it that the UK would commit to them?
Reparations are measures to make amends for past actions deemed wrong or unfair.
From 1500, the British government and the monarchy were prominent participants in the centuries-long slave trade, alongside other European nations.
Britain also had a key role in ending the trade, through Parliament's passage of a law to abolish slavery in 1833.
As part of that law, British plantation owners were paid for the loss of their slaves, to the tune of some £20m.
The UK only finished paying off the debt it incurred to cover the payments in 2015.
Reparations for the benefit of those who suffered as result of slavery can take many forms, from financial to symbolic.
The United Nations says they must be “proportional to the gravity of the violations and the harm suffered”.
Here are some of the forms they can take.
Money
This is the most commonly understood form of reparatory justice – where a state gives money to a country whose communities it enslaved.
A 2023 report co-authored by a United Nations’ judge concluded that the UK owed more than £18tn to 14 countries in reparations.
The difficulty is that most European countries would struggle to find sums as astronomic as that.
The UK government, for example, spends a total of about £1.2tn every year.
Even if governments could find the money, it would be politically unpopular to spend so much on reparations and consequently less on schools and hospitals at home.
Some campaigners answer these points by saying reparations could be paid over time.
But many demands for straight cash payments are considered unfeasible by Western governments.
So for others, the debate about financial reparations often focuses instead on the question of debt relief.
Many developing countries which suffered from slavery owe large sums to Western countries.
The cancellation or reduction of that debt could lift a massive economic burden from a developing country at little political cost for a donor country.
Apology
On the face of it, this could appear relatively straightforward.
It does not cost anything, just a public act of atonement for past sins.
Some institutions – such as the Church of England – have apologised for links to slavery.
The difficulty, though, is that apologies can sometimes act as a declaration of legal responsibility for which there could be a financial cost.
Which is why states are often reluctant to take that step.
Earlier this week, former Prime Minister Tony Blair suggested it was wrong for states to apologise for historic wrongs – despite himself saying “sorry” in 2007.,
"You can go back over history, and you end up in a completely absurd position", he told Newsweek on Wednesday.
"The most important thing we can do for countries that have been marked by colonialism is to help them now.”
Few states that played a historic role in the slave trade have taken steps towards reparations.
Earlier this year, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak dismissed calls for the UK government to apologise and pay reparations for its role in slavery.
British authorities and the monarchy were participants in the trade, which saw millions of Africans enslaved and forced to work, especially on plantations in the Caribbean, between the 16th and 19th centuries.
Britain also had a key role in ending the trade through Parliament's passage of a law to abolish slavery in 1833.
The British government has never formally apologised for slavery or offered to pay reparations.
When asked if he thought Mr Sunak would take the Brattle Report seriously, Mr Robinson said: "I certainly hope he will."
Mr Robinson said he hoped Mr Sunak would change his opinion on reparations and urged him to read the Brattle Report.
But he added: "For me, it goes beyond what the government and the political parties want.
"Of course they should set the tone. But I would like to see the people of the United Kingdom involved in this exercise as a whole."
When asked if the £18.8tn figure could be too little, Mr Robinson said: "You need to bear in mind that these high figures, as high as they appear to be, reflect an underestimation of the reality of the damage caused by transatlantic chattel slavery. That's a comment that cannot be ignored."
He said the sums in the report "accurately reflect the enormity of the damage cause by slavery".
He said: "It amazes me that countries could think, in this day and age, when the consequences of that practice are clear for everyone to see, that they can bury their heads in the sand, and it doesn't concern them. It's as though they are in a kind of la la land."
Legal debate
As to how reparations could be achieved, Mr Robinson said that was up the governments to decide.
"I believe a diplomatic solution recommends itself," he said. "I don't rule out a court approach as well."
The legal status of reparations demands by states is highly contested.
Representatives of Caribbean states have previously stated their intention to bring the issue to the ICJ, but no action has been taken.
Reparations are broadly recognised as compensation given for something that was deemed wrong or unfair, and can take the many forms.
In recent years, Caribbean leaders, activists and the descendants of slave owners have been putting Western government under increasing pressure to engage with the reparations movement.
Some of the descendants of slave owners - such as former BBC journalist Laura Trevelyan, and the family of 19th Century Prime Minister William Gladstone - have attempted to make amends.
In response to the BBC's request for comment, the UK government pointed to comments made by Foreign Minister David Rutley in Parliament earlier this year.
He said: "We acknowledge the role of British authorities in enabling the slave trade for many years before being the first global force to drive the end of the slave trade in the British empire."
He said the government believes "the most effective way for the UK to respond to the cruelty of the past is to ensure that current and future generations do not forget what happened, that we address racism, and that we continue to work together to tackle today's challenges".
Education
This includes educational institutions acknowledging their own connection to slavery and how they might have profited from the slave trade.
It can also involve teaching the history of slavery, as well as creating institutions for the study of slavery.
There are also calls for supporting schools to tackle low literacy levels and other issues that some argue date back to the slave trade.
Some campaigners say school exchanges and cultural tours would also be beneficial.
The countries pushing hardest for reparatory justice from the UK are in the Caribbean - and their collective organisation, known as Caricom, has its own reparations commission with 10 demands.
Three of these deal explicitly with education and culture, saying a "restoration of historical memory" was required.
Caricom said states involved in the slave trade had a responsibility to "build educational capacity and provide scholarships".
Health
Some argue that reparatory justice should also include health - where European countries fund clinics and hospitals.
Medical evidence shows a high rate of type 2 diabetes in the Caribbean which some suggest is associated with centuries of poor nutrition due to past enslavement.
Historian Sir Hilary Beckles told the United Nations's UN News, external earlier this year: "If you look at countries with the greatest incidence of chronic diseases, black people have the highest proportions of diabetic adult patients in the world."
He argued high rates of diabetes on his own island of Barbados "cannot be a coincidence" given it was "the first island to have an African majority and an enslaved population".
Barbados' government has moved toward , exploring the historic impact of slavery on its population's health.
Caricom is calling for European countries to invest in science, technology and capital toward improving hospitals, healthcare, and mental health support for the descendants of enslaved people.
Is the UK likely to provide reparations?
The UK government has never formally apologised
for slavery or offered to pay reparations – and Sir Keir Starmer has not shown any intention to break the mould.
It is not Labour Party policy to introduce reparations.
Ahead of the Commonwealth summit, the prime minister explicitly said he would not provide an apology or financial compensation for slavery.
He said he wanted to focus on present issues, like the climate, rather than the past.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves doubled down on Thursday afternoon, insisting the UK would not be paying reparations.
"I'd rather roll up my sleeves and work... on the current future-facing challenges than spend a lot of time on the past", she said.
In 2023, then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak likewise refused to provide compensation or an apology for the slave trade.
“Trying to unpick our history is not the right way forward”, he said.
10-Point Reparation Plan
In 2013 Caribbean Heads of Governments established the Caricom Reparations Commission (CRC) with a mandate to prepare the case for reparatory justice for the region’s indigenous and African descendant communities who are the victims of Crimes against Humanity (CAH) in the forms of genocide, slavery, slave trading, and racial apartheid.This document, prepared by the CRC, proposes the delivery of this mandate within the formulation of the Caricom Reparations Justice Program (CRJP). The CRC asserts that victims and descendants of these CAH have a legal right to reparatory justice, and that those who committed these crimes, and who have been enriched by the proceeds of these crimes, have a reparatory case to answer.
The CRJP recognizes the special role and status of European governments in this regard, being the legal bodies that instituted the framework for developing and sustaining these crimes. These governments, furthermore, served as the primary agencies through which slave based enrichment took place, and as national custodians of criminally accumulated wealth.
THE CRC ASSERTS THAT EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS:
Were owners and traders of enslaved Africans instructed genocidal actions upon indigenous communities
Created the legal, financial and fiscal policies necessary for the enslavement of Africans
Defined and enforced African enslavement and native genocide as in their ‘national interests’
Refused compensation to the enslaved with the ending of their enslavement
Compensated slave owners at emancipation for the loss of legal property rights in enslaved Africans
Imposed a further one hundred years of racial apartheid upon the emancipated
Imposed for another one hundred years policies designed to perpetuate suffering upon the emancipated and survivors of genocide
And have refused to acknowledge such crimes or to compensate victims and their descendants
Context
The CRC is committed to the process of national international reconciliation. Victims and their descendants have a duty to call for reparatory justice. Their call for justice is the basis of the closure they seek to the terrible tragedies that engulfed humanity during modernity. The CRC comes into being some two generations after the national independence process, and finds European colonial rule as a persistent part of Caribbean life.
The CRC operates within the context of persistent objection from European governments to its mandate. The CRC, nonetheless, is optimistic that the CRJP will gain acceptance as a necessary path to progress.
The CRC sees the persistent racial victimization of the descendants of slavery and genocide as the root cause of their suffering today. The CRC recognizes that the persistent harm and suffering experienced today by these victims as the primary cause of development failure in the Caribbean.
It calls upon European governments to participate in the CRJP with a view to prepare these victims and sufferers for full admission with dignity into the citizenry of the global community. The CRC here outlines the path to reconciliation, truth, and justice for VICTIMS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS.
Ten Point Action Plan
1. FULL FORMAL APOLOGY
The descendants of the indigenous peoples subjected to genocide, the loss of several cultures, and the erasure of numerous
languages require a full and formal apology. The descendants of the enslaved African population subjected to deadly forced migration, and a system of colonialism that destroyed their bodies and their cultures, require a full and formal apology. Groups subjected to deceptive systems of indenture deserve a full and formal apology. All the ancestors who were destroyed or affected by colonialism, their descendants alive today, and future generations require a full and formal apology. Only a full and formal apology can allow for the healing of wounds and the destruction of cultures caused by colonialism (enslavement and other forms of oppression of peoples).
A full apology accepts responsibility, commits to non-repetition, and pledges to repair the harm caused. Governments from countries responsible for the destruction have refused to offer apologies and have instead issued Statements of Regret. These statements do not acknowledge that crimes have been committed and continue to represent a refusal to take responsibility.
2. Indigenous Peoples Development Programmes
As a result of European conquest and colonisation, the indigenous peoples within the Member States of CARICOM have been subjected to forced migration within countries and across the region; to brutal work conditions, and genocide. Indigenous peoples were brutalized and killed as a result of official instructions to the European military commanders who came to the region. Those who were not immediately killed had their ancestral lands seized and a community of 3 million people in 1700 was decimated to less than 30 thousand in 2000. This also led to the
destruction of their languages and unique cultural heritage. Their descendants remain traumatized, landless, and are one of the most marginalized groups in the region as a result of the deliberate and racist discrimination on the part of the European colonizers.
Despite the efforts of the newly developing CARICOM Member States which have inherited the situation, the rebuilding of these communities cannot be done without responsible European States taking on the responsibility of correcting the damage and where possible, restoring the communities that still exist.
3. Funding for Repatriation to Africa
The descendants of African peoples stolen from their homes, lands, people, and cultures have a legal right of return; for unlike indentured workers, the enslaved had no contract guaranteeing the right to return or material incentives to remain. It is the responsibility of those States that are responsible for the forced movement and enslavement of their ancestors to establish a resettlement programme for those who wish to return. CARICOM has already been in contact with African States that are willing and able to allow for the return of their stolen people. The burden, however, of funding the resettlement of those who had been moved as a result of crimes by certain European States cannot be borne by the victims of the crimes.
A fully funded resettlement programme that allows for the repatriation of the displaced Africans in CARICOM Member States who wish to return while also addressing issues such as citizenship and re-integration are crucial steps to correcting the wrongs of enslavement and colonialism.
4. The Establishment of Cultural Institutions and the Return of Cultural Heritage
Part of the devastation of European colonisation was the deliberate attempt to destroy the cultures and languages of the indigenous peoples, enslaved Africans, and the indentured workers. Generations later, this has left a gap in the knowledge of some of these groups about the history of their ancestors as well as an inability to deeply appreciate, not only the full and complete lives and cultures they had before European colonization, but also the trauma and destruction they endured during the process, how they eventually gained freedom, and the strides they are taking to slowly rebuild.
The restoration of historical memory through community institutions such as museums and research centres will allow citizens to understand these crimes against humanity as well as other colonial harm and to memorialize their ancestors’ contributions to modern disciplines such as health care and technology. The absence of these institutions contributes to a sense of rootlessness of these groups within the region. The return of cultural heritage to now be put on display in the region would also allow for Caribbean school teachers, children, and academic researchers to have the benefit of access to the information that is now locked almost exclusively within European institutions.
Though some private institutions have been established, CARICOM Member States have not been able, with their extremely limited resources, to build these institutions on their own. The Caribbean Reparatory Justice Programme maintains that the destruction of historical memory is a crime for which reparation must be made
5. Assistance in Remedying the Public Health Crisis
CARICOM Member States are committed to providing high standards of health care for their populations in accordance with their international obligations. They are however unable, on their own, to deal with the multiple diseases that are the legacy of enslavement and have the potential to affect the majority of their populations. For example, the African descended population in the Caribbean has the highest incidence in the world of chronic diseases in the form of hypertension and Type
2 diabetes.
New medical evidence has shown that this is a result of the nutritional experience, physical and emotional brutality, and overall stress profiles associated with 400 years of enslavement.
The centuries of poor nutrition and overly salted foods given to the enslaved have now transmitted an inter-generational tendency for hypertension. This has devastating consequences for a health care system that was deliberately made inadequate by European colonizers and is now slowly being built by CARICOM Member States. It creates a burden that these States cannot shoulder on their own and these chronic health conditions now constitute the greatest financial risk to sustainability in the region.
Dealing with this health crisis requires the injection of science, technology, and capital beyond the capacity of the Region. European countries that are responsible for the crisis have an obligation to participate in its alleviation and to restore good health through the provision of hospitals and health care.
6. Education Programmes
There was barely an attempt during the period of enslavement and colonialism, to have a proper education system established to serve the needs of indigenous peoples, enslaved Africans and indentured workers. This unwillingness may be attributed to the deliberate desire of colonizers to have an uneducated labour force, dedicated to back- breaking and deadly work.
At the end of European colonialism, the black, indigenous, and indentured communities in CARICOM Member States were left in a general state of illiteracy. Where an education system did exist, it tended to be the European
influenced and was based on inequality on the bases of race and class.
CARICOM governments inherited a flawed education system, inadequate schools, high illiteracy and a system based on structural discrimination. CARICOM countries have worked hard to correct the situation. However, widespread functional illiteracy and inequitable systems of education still exist and have subverted the development efforts of these States and represent a drag upon social and economic advancement.
European States which presided over this system of inequality have a responsibility to build on the laudable efforts of the CARICOM post-colonial regimes, build educational capacity, and provide scholarships because development requires a highly educated population.
7. The Enhancement of Historical and Cultural Knowledge Exchanges
Colonialism created the situation where European culture was forced on the populations that lived in the Region, the people forcibly brought to the Region, or those who were brought under partially voluntary contracts. This forced acculturation was based on the incorrect and racist idea that the full and rich cultures of each of these groups was ‘inferior’ and needed to be erased. European countries involved in colonialism deliberately tried to distance people from the sources of their culture and belonging.
There was a deliberate effort on the part of responsible European countries to destroy African heritage. Other groups brought to the CARICOM region had a right to return to their homeland and learn about their history and peoples. There was no general right to return for enslaved Africans. This was a deliberate policy which created a deliberate disconnection and was part and parcel of the colonial project. This forced separation of Africans from their homeland has resulted in cultural and social alienation from identity and existential belonging.
The forced migration of indigenous peoples to various places and countries throughout the region, as well as their mass destruction through genocide has also led to a sense of rootlessness among them.
CARICOM Member States have spent the last
50 years trying to reverse the impact of centuries of disconnection. Part of reparatory justice therefore requires a programme of restoration of pride and one way of doing this is to intensify efforts to rebuild ‘bridges of belonging’. The Region cannot do it alone. The years of creating this represents an undue burden on newly developing States that must tackle other development challenges.
Programmes such as school exchanges and culture tours, community artistic and performance programs, entrepreneurial and religious engagements, as well as political interaction, are required in order to neutralize the void created by slave voyages and the forced destruction of the history and culture of indigenous and indentured groups.
CARICOM has made important advances in the area of developing connections with the homelands in Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia to facilitate cultural exchanges. Nevertheless, expansion of the funding of these programmes is part of repairing the destruction of colonisation and to be borne by responsible European States
8. Psychological Rehabilitation as a Result of the Transmission of Trauma
The history of colonialism by certain European States has inflicted serious psychological trauma upon indigenous and African descendant populations. African and Indigenous peoples therefore need rehabilitation for their affected populations. Mental health issues need to be treated like
other manifestations of illness.
Medical evidence for other traumatized populations now demonstrates that there can be inter-generational transmission of trauma.
It is plausible to argue that Africans have experienced inter-generational transmission of trauma from colonisation, the Middle Passage, enslavement, terror and brutalization, and genocide, and that this is in the DNA of the descendants of the survivors.
Though CARICOM Member States have attempted to provide rehabilitation support for the massive incidences of psychological trauma, the scarce resources and development challenges have meant that mental health care has lagged behind. Responsible European states have an obligation to repair the psychological trauma caused by colonialism and its evils in order to assist in rebuilding full and whole men, women and children.
9. The Right to Development through the Use of Technology
For 400 years the trade and production policies of Europe could be summed up in the British slogan: “not a nail is to be made in the colonies”. This was a deliberate decision to retard the technology available for development within CARICOM Member States.
The effectiveness of this policy meant that CARICOM Member States entered their nation building phases technologically and scientifically ill-equipped within the postmodern world economy.
Generations of youth within the region, as a consequence, have been denied membership and access to the science and technology culture and this represents and undue burden on the development of these States. Technology transfer and science sharing for development by responsible European States are important parts of repairing the deliberate harm to the development prospects of countries within CARICOM
10. Debt Cancellation and Monetary Compensation
CARICOM governments that emerged from slavery and colonialism have inherited the massive crisis of community poverty and an inability to deal with the development of their countries because of the burdens of the legacy of colonialism.
These governments still daily engage in the business of cleaning up the colonial mess and this forced newly emerging countries to borrow funds in order to meet their own international obligations. CARICOM Member States recognize the importance and desirability of providing the highest standards of living for their citizens. Nevertheless, the pressure of development has driven these governments to carry the burden of public employment, and has led them to create expensive social policies designed to confront colonial legacies.
This process has resulted in states accumulating unsustainable levels of public debt that now constitutes ‘fiscal entrapment’. Since correcting the burden of colonialism has fallen on these new States, they are unable to deal with the challenges of development without taking on onerous levels of debt. This debt cycle properly belongs to the governments from the responsible European countries who have made no sustained attempt to deal with debilitating colonial legacies.
Support for the payment of domestic debt, the cancellation of international debt, and direct monetary payments where appropriate, are necessary reparatory actions to correct the harm caused by colonialism that slaves were taken from Africa. This is not true! People were taken from Africa, among them healers and priests, and were made into slaves.”
10-Point Reparation Plan
In 2013 Caribbean Heads of
Governments established the
Caricom Reparations Commission
(CRC) with a mandate to prepare
the case for reparatory justice for
the region’s indigenous and
African descendant communities
who are the victims of Crimes
against Humanity (CAH) in the
forms of genocide, slavery, slave
trading, and racial apartheid.This
document, prepared by the CRC,
proposes the delivery of this
mandate within the formulation of
the Caricom Reparations Justice
Program (CRJP). The CRC asserts
that victims and descendants of
these CAH have a legal right to
reparatory justice, and that those
who committed these crimes, and
who have been enriched by the
proceeds of these crimes, have a
reparatory case to answer.
The CRJP recognizes the special
role and status of European
governments in this regard, being
the legal bodies that instituted the
framework for developing and
sustaining these crimes. These
governments, furthermore, served
as the primary agencies through
which slave based enrichment took
place, and as national custodians
of criminally accumulated wealth.
THE CRC ASSERTS THAT
EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS:
- Were owners and traders of
- enslaved Africans instructed
- genocidal actions upon
- indigenous communities.
- Created the legal, financial and
- fiscal policies necessary for
- the enslavement of Africans.
- Defined and enforced African enslavement and native genocide as in their ‘national interests’
- Refused compensation to the enslaved with the ending of their enslavement
- Compensated slave owners at emancipation for the loss of legal property rights in enslaved Africans
- Imposed a further one hundred years of racial apartheid upon the emancipated
- Imposed for another one hundred years policies designed to perpetuate suffering upon the emancipated and survivors of genocide
- And have refused to acknowledge such crimes or to compensate victims and their descendants
Context
The CRC is committed to the process of national international reconciliation. Victims and their descendants have a duty to call for reparatory justice. Their call for justice is the basis of the closure they seek to the terrible tragedies that engulfed humanity during modernity. The CRC comes into being some two generations after the national independence process, and finds European colonial rule as a persistent part of Caribbean life.
The CRC operates within the context of persistent objection from European governments to its mandate. The CRC, nonetheless, is optimistic that the CRJP will gain acceptance as a necessary path to progress.
The CRC sees the persistent racial victimization of the descendants of slavery and genocide as the root cause of their suffering today. The CRC recognizes that the persistent harm and suffering experienced today by these victims as the primary cause of development failure in the Caribbean.
It calls upon European governments to participate in the CRJP with a view to prepare these victims and sufferers for full admission with dignity into the citizenry of the global community. The CRC here outlines the path to reconciliation, truth, and justice for VICTIMS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS.
Ten Point Action Plan
- 1. FULL FORMAL APOLOGY
The descendants of the indigenous peoples subjected to genocide, the loss of several cultures, and the erasure of numerous
languages require a full and formal apology. The descendants of the enslaved African population subjected to deadly forced migration, and a system of colonialism that destroyed their bodies and their cultures, require a full and formal apology. Groups subjected to deceptive systems of indenture deserve a full and formal apology. All the ancestors who were destroyed or affected by colonialism, their descendants alive today, and future generations require a full and formal apology. Only a full and formal apology can allow for the healing of wounds and the destruction of cultures caused by colonialism (enslavement and other forms of oppression of peoples).A full apology accepts responsibility, commits to non-repetition, and pledges to repair the harm caused. Governments from countries responsible for the destruction have refused to offer apologies and have instead issued Statements of Regret. These statements do not acknowledge that crimes have been committed and continue to represent a refusal to take responsibility.
- 2. Indigenous Peoples Development Programmes
As a result of European conquest and colonisation, the indigenous peoples within the Member States of CARICOM have been subjected to forced migration within countries and across the region; to brutal work conditions, and genocide. Indigenous peoples were brutalized and killed as a result of official instructions to the European military commanders who came to the region. Those who were not immediately killed had their ancestral lands seized and a community of 3 million people in 1700 was decimated to less than 30 thousand in 2000. This also led to the
destruction of their languages and unique cultural heritage. Their descendants remain traumatized, landless, and are one of the most marginalized groups in the region as a result of the deliberate and racist discrimination on the part of the European colonizers.Despite the efforts of the newly developing CARICOM Member States which have inherited the situation, the rebuilding of these communities cannot be done without responsible European States taking on the responsibility of correcting the damage and where possible, restoring the communities that still exist.
- 3. Funding for Repatriation to AfricaThe descendants of African peoples stolen from their homes, lands, people, and cultures have a legal right of return; for unlike indentured workers, the enslaved had no contract guaranteeing the right to return or material incentives to remain. It is the responsibility of those States that are responsible for the forced movement and enslavement of their ancestors to establish a resettlement programme for those who wish to return. CARICOM has already been in contact with African States that are willing and able to allow for the return of their stolen people. The burden, however, of funding the resettlement of those who had been moved as a result of crimes by certain European States cannot be borne by the victims of the crimes.
A fully funded resettlement programme that allows for the repatriation of the displaced Africans in CARICOM Member States who wish to return while also addressing issues such as citizenship and re-integration are crucial steps to correcting the wrongs of enslavement and colonialism.
- 4. The Establishment of Cultural Institutions and the Return of Cultural HeritagePart of the devastation of European colonisation was the deliberate attempt to destroy the cultures and languages of the indigenous peoples, enslaved Africans, and the indentured workers. Generations later, this has left a gap in the knowledge of some of these groups about the history of their ancestors as well as an inability to deeply appreciate, not only the full and complete lives and cultures they had before European colonization, but also the trauma and destruction they endured during the process, how they eventually gained freedom, and the strides they are taking to slowly rebuild.
The restoration of historical memory through community institutions such as museums and research centres will allow citizens to understand these crimes against humanity as well as other colonial harm and to memorialize their ancestors’ contributions to modern disciplines such as health care and technology. The absence of these institutions contributes to a sense of rootlessness of these groups within the region. The return of cultural heritage to now be put on display in the region would also allow for Caribbean school teachers, children, and academic researchers to have the benefit of access to the information that is now locked almost exclusively within European institutions.
Though some private institutions have been established, CARICOM Member States have not been able, with their extremely limited resources, to build these institutions on their own. The Caribbean Reparatory Justice Programme maintains that the destruction of historical memory is a crime for which reparation must be made
- 5. Assistance in Remedying the Public Health CrisisCARICOM Member States are committed to providing high standards of health care for their populations in accordance with their international obligations. They are however unable, on their own, to deal with the multiple diseases that are the legacy of enslavement and have the potential to affect the majority of their populations. For example, the African descended population in the Caribbean has the highest incidence in the world of chronic diseases in the form of hypertension and Type
2 diabetes.New medical evidence has shown that this is a result of the nutritional experience, physical and emotional brutality, and overall stress profiles associated with 400 years of enslavement.
The centuries of poor nutrition and overly salted foods given to the enslaved have now transmitted an inter-generational tendency for hypertension. This has devastating consequences for a health care system that was deliberately made inadequate by European colonizers and is now slowly being built by CARICOM Member States. It creates a burden that these States cannot shoulder on their own and these chronic health conditions now constitute the greatest financial risk to sustainability in the region.
Dealing with this health crisis requires the injection of science, technology, and capital beyond the capacity of the Region. European countries that are responsible for the crisis have an obligation to participate in its alleviation and to restore good health through the provision of hospitals and health care. - 6. Education ProgrammesThere was barely an attempt during the period of enslavement and colonialism, to have a proper education system established to serve the needs of indigenous peoples, enslaved Africans and indentured workers. This unwillingness may be attributed to the deliberate desire of colonizers to have an uneducated labour force, dedicated to back- breaking and deadly work.
At the end of European colonialism, the black, indigenous, and indentured communities in CARICOM Member States were left in a general state of illiteracy. Where an education system did exist, it tended to be the European
influenced and was based on inequality on the bases of race and class.
CARICOM governments inherited a flawed education system, inadequate schools, high illiteracy and a system based on structural discrimination. CARICOM countries have worked hard to correct the situation. However, widespread functional illiteracy and inequitable systems of education still exist and have subverted the development efforts of these States and represent a drag upon social and economic advancement.
European States which presided over this system of inequality have a responsibility to build on the laudable efforts of the CARICOM post-colonial regimes, build educational capacity, and provide scholarships because development requires a highly educated population.
- 7. The Enhancement of Historical and Cultural Knowledge ExchangesColonialism created the situation where European culture was forced on the populations that lived in the Region, the people forcibly brought to the Region, or those who were brought under partially voluntary contracts. This forced acculturation was based on the incorrect and racist idea that the full and rich cultures of each of these groups was ‘inferior’ and needed to be erased. European countries involved in colonialism deliberately tried to distance people from the sources of their culture and belonging.
There was a deliberate effort on the part of responsible European countries to destroy African heritage. Other groups brought to the CARICOM region had a right to return to their homeland and learn about their history and peoples. There was no general right to return for enslaved Africans. This was a deliberate policy which created a deliberate disconnection and was part and parcel of the colonial project. This forced separation of Africans from their homeland has resulted in cultural and social alienation from identity and existential belonging.
The forced migration of indigenous peoples to various places and countries throughout the region, as well as their mass destruction through genocide has also led to a sense of rootlessness among them.CARICOM Member States have spent the last
50 years trying to reverse the impact of centuries of disconnection. Part of reparatory justice therefore requires a programme of restoration of pride and one way of doing this is to intensify efforts to rebuild ‘bridges of belonging’. The Region cannot do it alone. The years of creating this represents an undue burden on newly developing States that must tackle other development challenges.Programmes such as school exchanges and culture tours, community artistic and performance programs, entrepreneurial and religious engagements, as well as political interaction, are required in order to neutralize the void created by slave voyages and the forced destruction of the history and culture of indigenous and indentured groups.
CARICOM has made important advances in the area of developing connections with the homelands in Africa, the Caribbean, and Asia to facilitate cultural exchanges. Nevertheless, expansion of the funding of these programmes is part of repairing the destruction of colonisation and to be borne by responsible European States
- 8. Psychological Rehabilitation as a Result of the Transmission of TraumaThe history of colonialism by certain European States has inflicted serious psychological trauma upon indigenous and African descendant populations. African and Indigenous peoples therefore need rehabilitation for their affected populations. Mental health issues need to be treated like
other manifestations of illness.Medical evidence for other traumatized populations now demonstrates that there can be inter-generational transmission of trauma.
It is plausible to argue that Africans have experienced inter-generational transmission of trauma from colonisation, the Middle Passage, enslavement, terror and brutalization, and genocide, and that this is in the DNA of the descendants of the survivors.Though CARICOM Member States have attempted to provide rehabilitation support for the massive incidences of psychological trauma, the scarce resources and development challenges have meant that mental health care has lagged behind. Responsible European states have an obligation to repair the psychological trauma caused by colonialism and its evils in order to assist in rebuilding full and whole men, women and children.
- 9. The Right to Development through the Use of TechnologyFor 400 years the trade and production policies of Europe could be summed up in the British slogan: “not a nail is to be made in the colonies”. This was a deliberate decision to retard the technology available for development within CARICOM Member States.
The effectiveness of this policy meant that CARICOM Member States entered their nation building phases technologically and scientifically ill-equipped within the postmodern world economy.
Generations of youth within the region, as a consequence, have been denied membership and access to the science and technology culture and this represents and undue burden on the development of these States. Technology transfer and science sharing for development by responsible European States are important parts of repairing the deliberate harm to the development prospects of countries within CARICOM
- 10. Debt Cancellation and Monetary CompensationCARICOM governments that emerged from slavery and colonialism have inherited the massive crisis of community poverty and an inability to deal with the development of their countries because of the burdens of the legacy of colonialism.
These governments still daily engage in the business of cleaning up the colonial mess and this forced newly emerging countries to borrow funds in order to meet their own international obligations. CARICOM Member States recognize the importance and desirability of providing the highest standards of living for their citizens. Nevertheless, the pressure of development has driven these governments to carry the burden of public employment, and has led them to create expensive social policies designed to confront colonial legacies.
This process has resulted in states accumulating unsustainable levels of public debt that now constitutes ‘fiscal entrapment’. Since correcting the burden of colonialism has fallen on these new States, they are unable to deal with the challenges of development without taking on onerous levels of debt. This debt cycle properly belongs to the governments from the responsible European countries who have made no sustained attempt to deal with debilitating colonial legacies.
Support for the payment of domestic debt, the cancellation of international debt, and direct monetary payments where appropriate, are necessary reparatory actions to correct the harm caused by colonialism
that slaves were taken from Africa. This is not true! People were taken from Africa, among them healers and priests, and were made into slaves.”
No comments:
Post a Comment