Showing posts with label vaccinations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccinations. Show all posts

Sunday, November 25, 2012

4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women

Dear VacTruth.com Readers,


Protect your baby.
  • 1255Share

An increase of fetal deaths were reported to VAERS after pregnant women were given flu vaccines.



You are moments away from finding out what happened
when pregnant women were given this vaccine would 
"protect" their child. Instead, it likely did the 
exact opposite...

Just a warning - this information is disturbing and
I do NOT recommend you read this if you anger easily.

Read the article now. Scroll down.
Click Here



Sincerely,

Jeffry John Aufderheide
Editor of VacTruth.com 

Documentation received from the National Coalition of 
Organized Women (NCOW) states that between 2009 and 
2010 the mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations have 
increased Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems 
(VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250 percent in 
pregnant women. Eileen Dannemann, NCOW’s director, 
made abundantly clear that despite these figures 
being known to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 
the multiple-strain, inactivated flu vaccine contain-
ing mercury (Thimerosal) has once again been recomme-
nded to pregnant women as a safe vaccination this 
season.
Outraged by the CDC’s total disregard for human life,
Ms. Dannemann accused the CDC of ‘willful misconduct,
’ saying that they are responsible for causing the 
deaths of thousands of unborn babies. She stated that 
the CDC deliberately misled the nation’s obstetrician
s and gynecologists and colluded with the American 
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mis-
lead the public by advertising the flu vaccine as a 
safe vaccine for pregnant women when they knew fully 
well that it was causing a massive spike in fetal 
deaths.
In a letter to Dr. Joseph Mercola, Ms. Dannemann 
wrote:
“Not only did the CDC fail to disclose the 
spiraling spike in fetal death reports in real 
time during the 2009 pandemic season as to cut 
the fetal losses, but also we have documented by 
transcript Dr. Marie McCormick, chairperson of 
the Vaccine Safety Risk Assessment Working Group 
(VSRAWG) on September 3, 2010, denying any 
adverse events in the pregnant population during 
the 2009 Pandemic season.” [1]

HIDING LIFE-OR-DEATH EVIDENCE

Because the H1N1 pandemic vaccine had never been test
-ed on the pregnant population, and to lessen the 
intensity of fears of the unknown risks, Dr. Marie

McCormick of the CDC was employed to keep track of 
all adverse events during the 2009 pandemic season, 
including those adverse events in the pregnant 
population. Dr. McCormick was responsible for sending 
monthly reports to the Secretary of the Health and 
Human Services (HHS), citing any suspicious adverse 
events.

According to Ms. Dannemann, NCOW has been unable to 
obtain access to these monthly reports. After sending
a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC, she 
was told that she may have to wait 36 months to 
access what should be published public reports.

The Mercola letter continues:
“The Advisory Committee on Childhood Vaccines 
(ACCV) and CDC were confronted with the VAERS 
data from NCOW on September 3,2010,in Washington, 
D.C., and then again by conference call on 
September 10, and then again in Atlanta, Georgia,
 on October 28, 2010. On both September 3 and 
September 10, Dr. Marie McCormick clearly denied 
that there were any adverse events for pregnant 
women from the 2009 flu vaccine.”

THE DOCTOR’S VERSION OF CONCEAL 

AND CARRY

To emphasize their point, on October 28, 2010, NCOW 
requested that Dr. Rene Tocco present their data at 
the CDC headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. The CDC’s 
Dr. Shimabakuru gave a presentation on significant 
adverse reactions to the H1N1 vaccine, such as cases 
of Guillane-Barre Syndrome, which appeared to have 
risen three percent, claiming it as an insignificant 
signal.

No mention at all was made of adverse events related
to pregnant women.

Unfortunately for Dr. Shimabakuru, his attempts to 
pull the wool over the eyes of the audience were 
foiled when he was challenged by a member of the 
audience asking if the vaccine caused adverse events 
in pregnancy. Feeling cornered, he reluctantly looked 
in his bag and sheepishly presented a slide that 
corroborated the NCOW data, confirming that the CDC 
knew of the spike in fetal deaths in the fall of 2010
.[2]

So, why did Dr. Shimabkauru have a slide containing 
compromising evidence in his bag? Why did he decide 
to hide the slide? Surely, if he had prepared a slide 
outlining this crucial data, it would have made sense 
to include the slide in his presentation. After all, 
a 4,250 percent increase in fetal deaths is far more 
significant that a three percent increase in Guillane
-Barre Syndrome.
Ms. Dannemann believes that the existence of this 
slide, along with the omission of it in his present-
ation, confirms that the CDC knew of the spike in 
fetal deaths by the fall of 2010 and was attempting 
by any means possible not to make it public.
Outlining a catalog of events, Ms. Dannemann believes 
the CDC’s continual cover ups puts the lives of 
pregnant women and their unborn children in serious 
jeopardy. She maintained:
“Continuing the vaccine program without notifying 
the public or the healthcare practitioners of the 
VAERS miscarriage/stillbirth incoming data was 
clearly a purposeful decision. The CDC, aware of 
their own incoming stream of early vaccine 
adverse events reports, clearly decided to allow 

the obstetricians to continue, unwittingly, 
murdering and damaging the unborn so that the CDC
’s blunder of recommending the double-dose vacci-
nation of pregnant women could be kept under the 
radar.”

COLLABORATION AND CORRUPTION

Despite evidence that the CDC knew of the 4,250 
percent increase in fetal death reports in 2009/2010,
in order to ensure the continuance of the vaccine 
program for pregnant women, the CDC published a study 
in AJOG authored by Dr. Pedro Moro of the CDC in the 
fall of 2010. The study articulated that there were 
only 23 miscarriages caused by the single flu vaccine
 in 19 years between 1990 – 2009, an average of 1.2 
miscarriages per year. This study formed the basis 
of a CDC worldwide publicity campaign that the flu 
shot was safe for pregnant women by willfully and 
strategically excluding the 2009 pandemic data, which 
was available to them. 

Ms. Dannemann said:
“Both the CDC and AJOG were well aware of the fact
that physicians and the public were awaiting the 
results of the 2009 H1N1 untested vaccine on 
pregnant women, amid solid assurances to the 
public at the beginning of the pandemic season 
 that the CDC was on top of collecting any adverse
 reactions to the vaccine by establishing the 
Vaccine Safety Risk Assessment Working Group 
 chaired by Dr. Marie Mc Cormick (VSRAWG).”
Ms. Dannemann stated that by including the 2008/2009 
flu season’s data but excluding the available 2009 
data from the 2009/2010 flu season in the study 
published in AJOG, Dr. Moro was able to give the 
impression that the 2009/2010 pandemic season was 
covered in the data, which of course it was not. 
Ms. Dannemann believes that this was a deliberate 
act on his part because he was aware of the fetal 
death spike in the 2009/2010 data at the time of 
preparing the study and purposely excluded the 2009 
pandemic data from the study to hide this fact.
In the fall of 2010, just in time for the new flu 
season, media outlets all over the world publicized 
the AJOG, peer-reviewed CDC/Dr. Moro study as adamant
 proof that the flu shot is safe for pregnant women.
 The NCOW documents prove at the same time as widely 
publicizing advice that all pregnant women required 
the combined flu vaccination, the CDC was busy organ-
izing ten non-profit organizations, to sign a joint 
letter to urge obstetricians and gynecologists to 
continue to vaccinate their pregnant patients.
One of the organizations to sign the letter was The 
 March of Dimes [3] who urged health care providers 
to recommend the flu vaccine to pregnant women and 
those who expect to become pregnant. 

They wrote the following recommendation to all medical 
professionals:
“Advice from a healthcare provider plays an impor-
tant role in a pregnant and postpartum woman’s de-
cision to get vaccinated against seasonal 
influenza. The American Academy of Family Physici-
ans (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), 
American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM), 
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologis-
ts (The College), 
 American Medical Association (AMA), 
American Nurses Association (ANA), 
American Pharmacists Association (APhA), 
Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and 
Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN), March of Dimes, and 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
are asking for your help in urging your pregnant 
and postpartum patients to get vaccinated against 
seasonal influenza.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices 
(ACIP) recommends that pregnant and postpartum 
women receive the seasonal influenza vaccine this 
year, even if they received 2009 H1N1 or seasonal 
influenza vaccine last year. Lack of awareness of 
the benefits of vaccination and concerns about 
vaccine safety are common barriers to influenza 
 vaccination of pregnant and postpartum women.”
Representatives from all ten organizations signed the 
letter.

March of Dimes Document

WHAT THE CDC FAILED 

TO TELL PREGNANT MOMS

This year, on September 27, 2012, the Human and Environmental Toxicology Journal (HET) published Dr. Gary Goldman’s study that 
confirms NCOWs data, a 4,250 percent increase in the 
number of miscarriages and stillbirths reported to 
VAERS in the 2009/2010 flu season. [4] 

The study points out an astounding fact that no one 
saw until the publishing of the Goldman study in HET: 
the CDC had recommended the double-dosing of the 
 pregnant population with the seasonal flu vaccine 
with mercury and the untested H1N1 vaccine with 
mercury.

In his abstract, Goldman said:
“The aim of this study was to compare the number 
of inactivated-influenza vaccine–related spontan-
eous abortion and stillbirth (SB) reports in the 
 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 
database during three consecutive flu seasons 
beginning 2008/2009 and assess the relative fetal
death reports associated with the two-vaccine 
2009/2010 season.”

The facts that Goldman exposed are extremely disturb-
ing. He highlights the fact that the safety and 
effectiveness of the A-H1N1 had never been establish-
ed in pregnant women and that the combination of two
different influenza vaccines had never been tested on
pregnant women at all.

Even more worrisome is the fact that the A-H1N1 
vaccine inserts from the various manufacturers 
contained this warning:
“It is also not known whether these vaccines can 
cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant 
women or can affect reproduction capacity.’’  
(emphasis added)
Dr. Goldman also pointed out that the developing 
fetus is indirectly exposed to mercury when thimerosal
-containing vaccines are administered to a pregnant 
woman. He outlined a study written by A.R. Gasset, 
M. Itoi, Y. Ischii and R.M. Ramer who examined what 
happened after rabbits were vaccinated with thimerosal
–containing radioactive mercury. Goldman stated that 
from one hour post-injection to six hours post-inject-
ion, the level of radioactive mercury in the blood 
dropped over 75 percent. Yet from two hours post-inje-
ction to six hours post-injection, there were signifi-
cantly increased radioactivity levels in the fetal 
brain, liver, and kidney.

Dr. Goldman concluded that because the rates of mis-
carriage reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events 
Reporting System (VAERS) for the single flu vaccine 
were relatively low, health care providers developed
a false sense of security that flu vaccines administ-
ered during pregnancy were safe.  Goldman explained 
that just because a single vaccine has been tested 
and considered to be relatively safe, this does not 
mean that vaccinating pregnant women with two or more 
Thimerosal containing vaccines will be safe for them 
or their unborn babies. Overall, Goldman firmly 
believes that the VAERS grossly underestimates the 
true rates of miscarriage and other adverse events 
encountered in the US population. Remember, it is 
estimated that  less than a tenth of true adverse re-
actions are reported to the VAERS with a one percent 
reporting rate for serious adverse events, including 
death, according to a study led by former FDA 
Commissioner Dr. David A. Kessler. [5]

As seen in the Goldman study, with the return to a 
single flu shot, the flu vaccine-related reports of 
fetal loss have returned to a significantly lower 
level compared to the high level of fetal loss reports
 in the two-dose 2009/2010 flu season. However, higher 
than background flu shot vaccine-related fetal losses 
continue to be reported to the VAERS.

Furthermore, the Goldman study recommends that the 
babies who survived the deadly double dose in utero 
be monitored:
“In addition, because of the order of magnitude 
increase in fetal-loss report rates, from 6.8 
fetal loss reports per million pregnant women 
vaccinated in the single-dose 2008/2009 season to
77.8 in the two-dose 2009/2010 season, further 
long term studies are needed to assess adverse 
outcomes in the surviving children. Additional 
research concerning potential synergistic risk 
factors associated with the administration of 
Thimerosal-containing vaccines is warranted, 
and the exposure-effect association should be 
verified in further toxicological and case-
control studies.” (emphasis added)
Aside from fetal deaths, the CDC initiative to 
increase uptake of vaccines in pregnant women 
continues to fuel the increases in the levels of 
neurodevelopmental, developmental, behavioral 
abnormalities, and chronic illness in the surviving 
children. Due to omitting reports of fetal deaths, the
 CDC enjoys success in increasing the uptake and 
number of vaccines in the pregnant population. The 
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 
is now recommending not only the flu shot (with 
mercury) but also the Tdap vaccine.

CONCLUSION

The work of NCOW and Dr. Goldman has proven that 
potential lives are being destroyed before they are 
even old enough to draw their first breath. Developing 
fetuses who are fortunate enough to survive the 
onslaught of vaccinations now being recommended to 
pregnant women then need to play a form of Russian 
Roulette from the day they are born, because their 
caring parents followed the advice they were given by
professionals who have been deliberately misguided.
Eileen Dannemann and her team have proven with their 
remarkable work that both public and professionals 
alike are being lied to and deceived by organizations 

put in place by the government to sanction our 
vaccination programs. In my opinion, this is genocide 
and the sooner people realize that all vaccines come 
with an element of risk and begin to research the 
dangers for themselves, the sooner these insane 
experiments will end.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Eileen Dannemann and Dr. Paul 
King for asking VacTruth.com to report on their very 
important work.
Eileen Dannemann is the director of the National 
 Coalition of Organized Women and the founder of the 
student vaccine liberation Army 
www.VaccineLiberationArmy.com. 
Dr. Gary Goldman and Dr. Paul G. King, vaccine 
consultant to NCOW, have provided to the public a 
most important study.


Referencesfficial transcript

  1. OCDC’s Dr. Marie McCormick 
    denies miscarriages, Sept. 3, 2010 ACCV. 
    See page 37.
  2. Influenza Vaccine Safety Monitoring (slide 20).
    CDC’s Dr. Tom Shimabukuro confirms NCOW data ,
     Oct. 28, 2010 ACIP
  3. Letter from March of Dimes, inlcuded in this 
    article.
  4. Dr Gary Goldman Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss
    reports during three consecutive influenza 
    seasons: Was there a synergistic fetal 
    toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 
    2009/2010 season?
    http://het.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/09/12/0960327112455067.abstract?rss=1 (abstract
     only)
  5. Kessler, D.A. The Working Group. Natanblut, 
    S. Kennedy, D. Lazar, E. Rheinstein, P. et al.
    Introducing MedWatch: A New Approach to 
    Reporting Medication and Device Adverse 
    Effects and Product Problems. JAMA 1993 June 
    2. 269 (21): 2765-2768.

Friday, May 25, 2012

CERVICAL CANCER: Be careful about promoting vaccination

THE Singapore Paediatric Society's call for a nationwide vaccination project against cervical cancer must be considered carefully.

Cervical cancer is Singapore's seventh-most common cancer.

 Drastic declines in the number of new cases detected and its mortality rates are due to the easy availability of Pap smear screenings.


Pap smears, only for women who have sex, are pivotal in reducing cervical cancer.


The cancer grows, slowly, typically taking seven to 10 years to develop, and is mainly caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV) , which is transmitted only through sexual intercourse.


Most HPV infections clear naturally but 5 per cent turn into cervical cancer.


There are more than 20 types of HVP that cause cervical cancer, of which the vaccines protect against two that cause 70 per cent of the cancer.


The vaccines cost between S$450 and S$600, compared to other compulsory vaccines for children that cost S$10 to S$20 each.


So a national programme to vaccinate 180,000 girls aged 10 to 14 will be expensive (S$81 million and S$108 million) and the question of cost-effectiveness arises.


The vaccines' efficacy period is also unknown, but scientists have determined it to be no more than 6.4 years; not enough to cover the recommended 17 years from age nine to 26. Hence, vaccination will only postpone, not prevent, the cancer.


The vaccines' ability to prevent new cases is lower than the Pap smear's.
The vaccines do not protect against the remaining HPV types, leaving a 30 per cent chance of being exposed to the cancer.


The Singapore Healthy Ministry should track possible adverse effects because reports from monitoring centres WARN of serious and fatal effects on young Americans. Pap smears should not be relegated because they are not limited by a period of effectiveness, incur the lower rate of new cases and are safe. They are effective and cheap at S$15 to S$40 each time. 


The Singapore Cancer Society even offers free Pap smears. So it may be more cost-effective to spend on increasing the awareness and use of Pap smears .


To reduce cervical cancer, information about all methods of prevention must be offered.
Public education must emphasise the role of sexual abstinence and sexually transmitted diseases, and explain the importance of Pap smears even after resorting to HPV vaccinations. Only then should the role of HPV vaccinations be explained.


Otherwise, parents, girls and young women may be lulled into a false sense of security and inadvertently reverse the cancer's declining trend. --Edmund Leong ,The Chief Executive Officer of the Singapore Cancer Society.


Cancer Statistics

TEN MOST FREQUENT CANCERS IN SINGAPORE
Top 10 cancers affecting Singapore men
Site Ranking No.
Colo-rectum 1 4456
Lung 2 4062
Prostate 3 2860
Liver 4 1897
Stomach 5 1579
Skin (including Melanoma) 6 1404
Lymphoma 7 1247
Nasopharynx 8 1158
Kidney & Other Urinary 9 821
Bladder 10 759

Top 10 cancers affecting Singapore women

Site Ranking No.
Breast 1 7781
Colo-rectum 2 3750
Lung 3 2057
Corpus Uteri 4 1574
Ovary 5 1455
Skin (including Melanoma) 6 1136
Stomach 7 1113
Cervix Uteri 8 993
Lymphoma 9 960
Thyroid 10 808

Source:
Singapore Cancer Registry, Interim Report
(Trends In Cancer Incidence In Singapore 2006-2010)
 (NaturalNews) Several doctors and women's groups in India are
lambasting advertisements puts out by drug giants GlaxoSmithKline
(GSK) and Merck for their human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine.
Objecting to the claims being made that the vaccine protects against
cervical cancer, The Sama Resource Centre for Women and Health,
Saheli Women's Resource Centre, and a group of doctors are
sounding the alarm that the ads are misleading and inaccurate.

Marketed in the United States as Gardasil, the HPV vaccine is
being touted by its manufacturers as the greatest thing since
sliced bread as far as preventing cervical cancer. Even in India,
the marketing campaign for the vaccine has been so successful
that pediatricians all over the country are urging parents to have
their adolescent daughters vaccinated.

Budev Chandra Das, a professor of biomedical research at
Delhi University, and Dr. Sidharth Sahni, a surgical oncology
 consultant at Artemis Health Institute, have both been questioning
the legitimacy of the vaccine, noting that there are many different
types of HPV that the vaccine does not prevent and that there are
other conditions that cause cervical cancer besides HPV.

The vaccine is allegedly only effective on young girls who have
never had sex, another important piece of information that doctors
and researchers are saying GSK and Merck have failed to effectively
communicate. Rather than divulge the truth of the matter, the two
drug companies seem only to be interested in convincing as many
people as possible to get the vaccine.

Vani Subramaniam from the Saheli Women's Resource Centre also
pointed out that the drug giants have concealed the truth about the
many horrific side effects caused by the vaccine. Merck's public list
of Gardasil's side effects include headache, fever, vomiting, fainting,
breathing problems, seizures, chronic fatigue, chest pains, and
stomach pain, just to name a few.

Many young women and girls in the U.S. have developed severe,
debilitating conditions after receiving their Gardasil shots. Aside
from the known side effects, some girls have become paralyzed
while others have developed chronic illness that has left them unable
to function properly. Many girls have actually died from receiving
Gardasil shots.

The harm caused by Gardasil is obscene, leaving one to wonder
how such a dangerous product can continue to be marketed and
sold legally with no repercussions on the villains who are
perpetrating it on the public. Not only is the vaccine a failure at
accomplishing its stated purpose, but it continues to destroy the
lives of the next generation of young girls who receive it.

Sources for this story include:
 http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/76944/Lifestyle/Vaccine+no+gu...

Learn more: 

Cervical cancer vaccine news,

 articles and information:


Merck's cervical cancer vaccine ads are inaccurate and misleading

3/3/2010 - Several doctors and women's groups in India are
lambasting advertisements puts out by drug giants GlaxoSmithKline
(GSK) and Merck for their human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine.
Objecting to the claims being made that the vaccine protects against
cervical cancer, The Sama Resource Centre for Women and...

The Cervical Cancer Vaccine may Not Work, but Broccoli Does

11/12/2009 - Gardasil, a vaccine designed to prevent cervical
cancer in women, has recently been the target of debate about
its safety and efficacy. While young girls have been dying and
key researchers are saying the vaccine doesn't work, there are
dozens of studies using natural compounds in broccoli that DO
work...

Top researcher who worked on cervical cancer vaccine warns about its dangers

10/8/2009 - One of the key researchers involved in the
clinical trials for both Gardasil and Cevarix cervical cancer
vaccines has gone public with warnings about their safety
and effectiveness. This highly unusual warning against these
 vaccines by one of Big Pharma's own researchers surfaced
in an exclusive interview...

Cervical cancer vaccine continues killing young girls like Natalie Morton; is pathology report a pharma cover-up? (opinion)

10/2/2009 - Natalie Morton is dead. One week ago, she was
an energetic and lively 14-year-old student who was just
following doctor's orders. Like all her other classmates, she
believed she was dutifully protecting her health by submitting
to a cervical cancer vaccine jab. But a few minutes after receiving
her...

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Shots Cause Intense Pain; Girls Fainting

8/1/2008 - Merck's human papillomavirus (HPV)
vaccine Gardasil is gaining a reputation as the most
painful childhood shot, and has led to a surge in the
rate of people fainting from vaccinations. Gardasil
protects against the two strains of HPV that are
responsible for 70 percent of cervical cancer cases and...

Concept-related articles:

cancer:
Merck:
cervical cancer:
HPV:
cancer vaccine:
Gardasil:
vaccine:
girls:
vaccines:
doctors:
side effects:
NaturalNews:
health:
safety:
WHO:
marketing:

Learn more: cervical cancer vaccine news and articles
http://www.naturalnews.com/cervical_cancer_vaccine.html#ixzz1vwKrl96E



Story 4: Cervical Cancer -- When There Is No War!

Vaty (T-755, not real name) is a 71-year old female. About ten 
years ago, Vaty had her right thyroid removed and eight months 
ago, her left thyroid was removed due to the presence of a 
nodule. According to the doctor these were not cancerous.

Some time in February 2008, Vaty had frequent urination but 
she passed out only a little amount of urine. Sometimes there 
was blood in her urine. Vaty felt dizzy, her stomach felt full and 
heavy. Everything in her mouth tasted bitter. She went for an 
examination at a private hospital.

CT Urography and CT scan of her abdomen and pelvis in 3 March 
2008 indicated an enlarged and irregular cervix in keeping with 
a cervical mass. The cervical mass extends into the right side 
of the urinary bladder, producing an irregular mass which 
obstructs the right vesicoureteric junction and results in right 
hydronephrosis. Two masses were seen in the omentum in the 
right side of the abdomen measuring approximately 3-4 cm each.  
These represent metastases. There are also pelvic and 
para-aortic lymphadenopathy.

Vaty was told to have two stents (internal drainage tubes) 
inserted into her ureters to facilitate her urine flow (note: 
 ureters are ducts that carry urine from the kidneys to the  
urinary bladder). However, the doctor was unable to insert 
these stents due to the blockage by the tumour. Vanty was 
then referred to another surgeon who did a biopsy of her 
tumour.  The cervical punch biopsies confirmed clinical 
diagnosis of the cancer of the cervix. The surgeon told 
the family members that there was no hope and the patient 
would die soon. Vanty was advised to undergo palliative 
chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 
However, these treatments would not do much for her either. 
Vaty declined further medical intervention and her children 
(daughters and sons) came to seek our help on 7 March 2008.

On 23 March 2008, Vaty’s two sons told us in greater detail 
what had happened during their encounter with the doctors 
at the hospital.

Chris: What did the doctors tell you when you brought your 
mother to see them?
Son: For the first visit, I was not there. My two sisters went 
with my mother to the hospital. At first we thought it was a 
urinary problem. So we went to see a urologist, Dr. A. After 
doing some tests, Dr. A said: I really don’t know what is wrong. 
 But he said that the right kidney was swollen. Dr. A referred my 
mother to see Dr. B for further management. Based on his clinical 
observations, Dr. B straight away told my sisters that my mother 
has cancer and it is at an advanced stage. There is nothing that 
can be done. No chance at all. Dr. B advised that my mother be 
admitted for a biopsy.

Chris: Why did he want to do a biopsy when he already said that
it was an advanced stage cancer?
Son: This was because the right kidney was swollen and Dr. A 
wanted to insert the stents into the ureters . So Dr. B could also 
do the biopsy at the same time. He wanted to confirm if the tumor
is malignant or not.

Chris: Did Dr. A manage to install the stents?
Son:  No, the ducts were blocked by the growth.

Chris: At that time, was your mother able to urinate?
Son:  Yes but after each urination, she felt that not all the 
content was discharged. Otherwise she was normal.

Chris: Why did the doctor want to put the stent then? Anyway, 
was Dr. B able to do the biopsy?
Son: Yes. The biopsy was done. I was there in the hospital. The 
doctor performed the blood tests, ECG and had the scans done.
Dr. B said all the tests gave normal results.  Dr. B told me that 
my mother has advanced stage cancer (even before seeing the 
biopsy result) and I have to send her for chemotherapy and 
radiotherapy. It she does not go for these treatments, the growth 
will block the kidneys and my mother will not be able to urinate. 
She will go into a comatose stage and die. This can happen 
within the next few weeks.

Chris: What? Die with the next few weeks?
Son: Yes, that was what the doctor said.

Chris: But your mother was still able to urinate you said.
Son:  Dr. B said there will be a blockage later as the tumor 
grows. I asked him what are we supposed to do now? 
Dr. B replied:  Nothing – only chemotherapy and 
radiotherapy. 
Then I asked:What are the chances?  
He replied: No chance – radiotherapy and 
chemotherapy would not help.

Chris: That being the case, why did the doctor want your 
mother to go for chemotherapy and radiotherapy?
Son: The doctor said the treatment can make her urinate 
and she would not be in pain. This would prevent her going 
into coma. It she doesn’t go for chemotherapy and 
radiotherapy, she will die within the next few weeks.

Chris: What was your reaction after hearing all these?
Son: I told Dr. B I would go back home and discuss the matter 
with my family. I then left. (Note: The family decided to seek 
our help and Vaty was started on herbs.) After I came to 
see you, I went back to see Dr. B again. The main purpose 
was to get the biopsy result. I told Dr. B that we had decided 
not to go for chemotherapy or radiotherapy. I told him: We 
have gone to see Dr. Chris and we have started giving my 
mother his herbs. Dr. B immediately said: No, no, the herbs 
wouldn’t work.

Chris: Was he angry when you said you were going for herbs?
Son: No, but he straight away said that it definitely wouldn’t 
help. He insisted that my mother go for chemotherapy and
 radiotherapy. Actually I sensed that he was a bit annoyed 
with me. He said: Bring your brother and sisters here and 
I’ll explain to them. I countered by saying: You said 
radiotherapy and chemotherapy wouldn’t work either. 
Furthermore, people say that these treatments would be 
painful and have side effects. Dr. B replied: No, no, there 
would be no pain at all. I replied: My mother is already 
71 years old.  The doctors still insisted that my mother go 
for chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Though these 
treatments wouldn’t help, Dr. B said: It is better to do 
the treatment.
Second son: It does not make any sense at all.

How Doctor’s Comments Affect Patients 
and 
Their Family Members

Chris: Just tell me honestly, right from your heart, how do 
you feel about the comments made by Dr. B?
Son:  I was very depressed and at the same time very angry.
 You know, the way he put it is very depressing. The way he 
delivered the message – whether my mother is going to do 
chemotherapy or not, she is doing to die. He used the word 
die, die, die so many times and he had no concern at all how 
this word affected me. For him, my mother is just another 
patient.

Chris:  Why were you angry?
Son:  In my work, I have encountered many doctors,
 especially the pediatricians – they showed so much concern 
for the children, but this guy (Dr.B), he had no compassion at 
all. 
In five minutes he used the word die, die, die so many times. 
I was really angry and told myself, it was lucky that I did not 
bring my mother along when I came to see him. Just imagine 
how my mother would feel if she was to hear all these from 
the doctor.
Second son: When we came to see you, the way you talked 
to us, made us so very confident. That is what a doctor 
should be.

Comments:  God was wise when He gave man the liberty to 
do whatever man wants. God only kept to Himself the 
prerogative to determine when and how man would die. 
Unfortunately, in spite of that, some men still play God.

Let me highlight some points for you to ponder on.
1. According to the doctor, without chemo-radiation, 
Vaty will go into coma within a few weeks based on the
idea that the urinary tubes will be blocked by the tumour.  
 The question is: what if the tubes are not blocked?  
According to the doctor this is going to happen within a 
few weeks. What does a “few weeks” means? As of this 
writing (more than two weeks), Vaty is still able to urinate.  
 Are we to imagine that in the next two weeks Vaty is 
going to pass off slowly?

2.  Whether Vaty undergoes chemo-radiation or not, the 
treatment would not alter the prognosis. Vaty is going to die.
That being said, what is the use of insisting that Vaty go for 
such treatments then? According to the doctor, it is better
to do it. Would you want to ask: What is so better about it? 
 Or is it just because the textbook says so – when you have 
cancer you must do go for chemotherapy and radiotherapy! 

3.  Dr. B said there would be no pain or side effects when 
this 71-year old Vaty undergo chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Do you believe him? 

4.  In our latest book: Cancer Why They Live, we wrote 
about perceived unhappiness of patients towards their doctors. 
 Doctors behaved in such a manner that patients and their 
family members felt disappointed and even betrayed. 
Vaty’s son felt the same way. Can you figure out why Dr. B 
was insisting that Vaty is going to die? All of us know that 
doctors are no gods and there is that much anyone can do.
But why is there a need to be so insensitive? Even in the 
face of imminent death, good words would go a long way 
to comfort the unfortunate. Why can’t doctors be gentle 
and more compassionate towards their patients? Patients 
come to them with full faith and trust. Whatever help and 
reassurance given would go a long way to comfort them. 
Why keep on insisting that she is going to die? 

5.  When Vaty first came to see us she presented with 
“cutting” pain in the right abdomen, poor appetite and being 
unable to sleep. She felt tired when climbing the stairs. She 
 felt breathless and wheezed. She had stomach discomforts 
due to wind and she burped a lot. She felt like vomiting and 
that something was stuck in her throat. There was some 
bleeding and she had bitter taste in her mouth. 

6.  After two weeks on the herbs, Vaty felt better. Her 
burping was less. Her appetite improved and she was able 
to sleep well. She was not breathless anymore and there 
was less wheezing. Her bleeding had stopped after taking 
the Pain Tea for two days. There were no more pain in her
 legs and no more backaches. The numbness that she felt 
earlier was also gone after a week on the herbs. The feeling 
of tightness in her throat was better.  In short, Vaty’s health
 had improved after taking the herbs. Are we going to imagine 
and say that within the next few weeks Vaty is going to go 
 into coma? 

7.  Vaty’s sons and daughters brought their mother to see 
us with good reason. One of  Vaty’s son is a friend of 
Nathan’s son (who came to see us about his father’s bone 
cancer in December 1999). Nathan and his family was told 
by his oncologist to get his papers in order because he only 
had six months to live. Nathan was on morphine every four 
hours and was not even able to lie down to sleep. Two weeks 
on the herbs, Nathan was able to walk to our centre. It has 
been eight years now and Nathan is well (or medically they 
say he is CURED!). He is able to lead a normal life. While we 
cannot guarantee that Vaty is going to be like Nathan, there 
is, however, a sense of hope when she was brought to see 
us.  On our part, we have seen many, many people being 
blessed like Nathan! So we never give up hope for 
such people! 

8.  After the herbs, Vaty felt better. To me and also to the 
rest of the family, we understand what that means. One of 
Vaty’s son said: I work in Kuala Lumpur and every week I 
come back to see my mother. I could see the difference in 
my mother’s face. She is getting better. And getting better 
 is all that matters. Vaty can once again begin to lead a 
normal life – for a while or for a much longer time (hopefully 
more than a few weeks!). NO, the doctors would scream –  
feeling better is not scientific! It is not a cure. I agree! In 
order not to mislead anyone, I have told Vaty’s  family
 members: Even if she is feeling better, it does not mean 
that the cancer is cured. The cancer is still there. But 
under the circumstances that we are in, what choice do we 
have? Would going for chemo-radiation be a better choice? 
Would enduring the toxic side-effects of chemo-radiation be 
a better option than taking herbs? 

9. Family members of most cancer patients fully agree with 
me that what matters most is their loved one does not 
suffer while still alive. So to be able to eat well, sleep well 
and move about, are all that they would hope for. And they 
would be happy and grateful for that. All of us eventually die. 
So death is not a consideration. We always remind patients 
that we cannot win our battle against death. We have to 
accept death as a natural process with grace.  But the 
die-hard medical view is different. Die-hard doctors want to 
 conquer death or postpone death if they can and by any 
means. These die-hards believe that their medicine and their 
technology can do that. Often they fail miserably when it 
comes to cancer.
For more reports on cancer, click http://cacare.com/index.php?searchword=cervical+cancer&option=com_search&Itemid=  


Cervical Cancer FAQ


You Can Give Me Anything Except Chemo or 

Radiotherapy

 
Yin was diagnosed with cancer of the cervix in 1999. This was 
followed by an operation. Since everything was clean, no 
further treatment was indicated. Barely four years later, in 
August 2003, Yin suffered severe pains in her backbone. 
Consultation with three oncologists yielded the same opinion – 
Go for chemotherapy and radiotherapy.  These would not 
cure her. The prognosis by these cancer experts was six 
 months to live! Yin said she would rather die than undergo 
chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She took herbs and lived!
Read more...

Surgery and Radiotherapy Did Not Cure Cervical 

Cancer: Recurrence After Twelve Years

 
An Tee was fifty-five years old when she was diagnosed with 
cervical cancer. This was in 1996.She underwent surgery to 
remove the cancer and this was followed by twelve external-
radiation treatments. In addition, she received internal-
radiation treatment. Ten years after this “apparent cure” An 
Tee started to cough. Her doctor did not consider anything 
amiss and she was told everything was alright. In August 
2006, i.e., twelve years after her diagnosis, An Tee was told 
that her kidney was not functioning well. A CT scan of the 
chest indicated both lungs were studded with numerous 
nodular lesions.
Read more...

To Undergo or Not to Undergo Radiotherapy / 

Chemotherapy?

 
A 64-year-old Indonesian was diagnosed with cancer of the 
cervix, Stage 2A. She received radiation treatment and 
chemotherapy. The cancer recurred a year after completion 
of the treatments. Patient died 1 year 8 months after 
diagnosis. A 73-year-old lady from Penang was also 
diagnosed with cancer of cervix Stage 2A. She declined 
medical treatment and was only on herbs. Two years and 
4 months later she was still doing well.
Read more...