Sunday, November 25, 2012

4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women

Dear Readers,

Protect your baby.
  • 1255Share

An increase of fetal deaths were reported to VAERS after pregnant women were given flu vaccines.

You are moments away from finding out what happened
when pregnant women were given this vaccine would 
"protect" their child. Instead, it likely did the 
exact opposite...

Just a warning - this information is disturbing and
I do NOT recommend you read this if you anger easily.

Read the article now. Scroll down.
Click Here


Jeffry John Aufderheide
Editor of 

Documentation received from the National Coalition of 
Organized Women (NCOW) states that between 2009 and 
2010 the mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations have 
increased Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems 
(VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250 percent in 
pregnant women. Eileen Dannemann, NCOW’s director, 
made abundantly clear that despite these figures 
being known to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 
the multiple-strain, inactivated flu vaccine contain-
ing mercury (Thimerosal) has once again been recomme-
nded to pregnant women as a safe vaccination this 
Outraged by the CDC’s total disregard for human life,
Ms. Dannemann accused the CDC of ‘willful misconduct,
’ saying that they are responsible for causing the 
deaths of thousands of unborn babies. She stated that 
the CDC deliberately misled the nation’s obstetrician
s and gynecologists and colluded with the American 
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mis-
lead the public by advertising the flu vaccine as a 
safe vaccine for pregnant women when they knew fully 
well that it was causing a massive spike in fetal 
In a letter to Dr. Joseph Mercola, Ms. Dannemann 
“Not only did the CDC fail to disclose the 
spiraling spike in fetal death reports in real 
time during the 2009 pandemic season as to cut 
the fetal losses, but also we have documented by 
transcript Dr. Marie McCormick, chairperson of 
the Vaccine Safety Risk Assessment Working Group 
(VSRAWG) on September 3, 2010, denying any 
adverse events in the pregnant population during 
the 2009 Pandemic season.” [1]


Because the H1N1 pandemic vaccine had never been test
-ed on the pregnant population, and to lessen the 
intensity of fears of the unknown risks, Dr. Marie

McCormick of the CDC was employed to keep track of 
all adverse events during the 2009 pandemic season, 
including those adverse events in the pregnant 
population. Dr. McCormick was responsible for sending 
monthly reports to the Secretary of the Health and 
Human Services (HHS), citing any suspicious adverse 

According to Ms. Dannemann, NCOW has been unable to 
obtain access to these monthly reports. After sending
a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC, she 
was told that she may have to wait 36 months to 
access what should be published public reports.

The Mercola letter continues:
“The Advisory Committee on Childhood Vaccines 
(ACCV) and CDC were confronted with the VAERS 
data from NCOW on September 3,2010,in Washington, 
D.C., and then again by conference call on 
September 10, and then again in Atlanta, Georgia,
 on October 28, 2010. On both September 3 and 
September 10, Dr. Marie McCormick clearly denied 
that there were any adverse events for pregnant 
women from the 2009 flu vaccine.”



To emphasize their point, on October 28, 2010, NCOW 
requested that Dr. Rene Tocco present their data at 
the CDC headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. The CDC’s 
Dr. Shimabakuru gave a presentation on significant 
adverse reactions to the H1N1 vaccine, such as cases 
of Guillane-Barre Syndrome, which appeared to have 
risen three percent, claiming it as an insignificant 

No mention at all was made of adverse events related
to pregnant women.

Unfortunately for Dr. Shimabakuru, his attempts to 
pull the wool over the eyes of the audience were 
foiled when he was challenged by a member of the 
audience asking if the vaccine caused adverse events 
in pregnancy. Feeling cornered, he reluctantly looked 
in his bag and sheepishly presented a slide that 
corroborated the NCOW data, confirming that the CDC 
knew of the spike in fetal deaths in the fall of 2010

So, why did Dr. Shimabkauru have a slide containing 
compromising evidence in his bag? Why did he decide 
to hide the slide? Surely, if he had prepared a slide 
outlining this crucial data, it would have made sense 
to include the slide in his presentation. After all, 
a 4,250 percent increase in fetal deaths is far more 
significant that a three percent increase in Guillane
-Barre Syndrome.
Ms. Dannemann believes that the existence of this 
slide, along with the omission of it in his present-
ation, confirms that the CDC knew of the spike in 
fetal deaths by the fall of 2010 and was attempting 
by any means possible not to make it public.
Outlining a catalog of events, Ms. Dannemann believes 
the CDC’s continual cover ups puts the lives of 
pregnant women and their unborn children in serious 
jeopardy. She maintained:
“Continuing the vaccine program without notifying 
the public or the healthcare practitioners of the 
VAERS miscarriage/stillbirth incoming data was 
clearly a purposeful decision. The CDC, aware of 
their own incoming stream of early vaccine 
adverse events reports, clearly decided to allow 

the obstetricians to continue, unwittingly, 
murdering and damaging the unborn so that the CDC
’s blunder of recommending the double-dose vacci-
nation of pregnant women could be kept under the 


Despite evidence that the CDC knew of the 4,250 
percent increase in fetal death reports in 2009/2010,
in order to ensure the continuance of the vaccine 
program for pregnant women, the CDC published a study 
in AJOG authored by Dr. Pedro Moro of the CDC in the 
fall of 2010. The study articulated that there were 
only 23 miscarriages caused by the single flu vaccine
 in 19 years between 1990 – 2009, an average of 1.2 
miscarriages per year. This study formed the basis 
of a CDC worldwide publicity campaign that the flu 
shot was safe for pregnant women by willfully and 
strategically excluding the 2009 pandemic data, which 
was available to them. 

Ms. Dannemann said:
“Both the CDC and AJOG were well aware of the fact
that physicians and the public were awaiting the 
results of the 2009 H1N1 untested vaccine on 
pregnant women, amid solid assurances to the 
public at the beginning of the pandemic season 
 that the CDC was on top of collecting any adverse
 reactions to the vaccine by establishing the 
Vaccine Safety Risk Assessment Working Group 
 chaired by Dr. Marie Mc Cormick (VSRAWG).”
Ms. Dannemann stated that by including the 2008/2009 
flu season’s data but excluding the available 2009 
data from the 2009/2010 flu season in the study 
published in AJOG, Dr. Moro was able to give the 
impression that the 2009/2010 pandemic season was 
covered in the data, which of course it was not. 
Ms. Dannemann believes that this was a deliberate 
act on his part because he was aware of the fetal 
death spike in the 2009/2010 data at the time of 
preparing the study and purposely excluded the 2009 
pandemic data from the study to hide this fact.
In the fall of 2010, just in time for the new flu 
season, media outlets all over the world publicized 
the AJOG, peer-reviewed CDC/Dr. Moro study as adamant
 proof that the flu shot is safe for pregnant women.
 The NCOW documents prove at the same time as widely 
publicizing advice that all pregnant women required 
the combined flu vaccination, the CDC was busy organ-
izing ten non-profit organizations, to sign a joint 
letter to urge obstetricians and gynecologists to 
continue to vaccinate their pregnant patients.
One of the organizations to sign the letter was The 
 March of Dimes [3] who urged health care providers 
to recommend the flu vaccine to pregnant women and 
those who expect to become pregnant. 

They wrote the following recommendation to all medical 
“Advice from a healthcare provider plays an impor-
tant role in a pregnant and postpartum woman’s de-
cision to get vaccinated against seasonal 
influenza. The American Academy of Family Physici-
ans (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), 
American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM), 
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologis-
ts (The College), 
 American Medical Association (AMA), 
American Nurses Association (ANA), 
American Pharmacists Association (APhA), 
Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and 
Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN), March of Dimes, and 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
are asking for your help in urging your pregnant 
and postpartum patients to get vaccinated against 
seasonal influenza.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices 
(ACIP) recommends that pregnant and postpartum 
women receive the seasonal influenza vaccine this 
year, even if they received 2009 H1N1 or seasonal 
influenza vaccine last year. Lack of awareness of 
the benefits of vaccination and concerns about 
vaccine safety are common barriers to influenza 
 vaccination of pregnant and postpartum women.”
Representatives from all ten organizations signed the 

March of Dimes Document



This year, on September 27, 2012, the Human and Environmental Toxicology Journal (HET) published Dr. Gary Goldman’s study that 
confirms NCOWs data, a 4,250 percent increase in the 
number of miscarriages and stillbirths reported to 
VAERS in the 2009/2010 flu season. [4] 

The study points out an astounding fact that no one 
saw until the publishing of the Goldman study in HET: 
the CDC had recommended the double-dosing of the 
 pregnant population with the seasonal flu vaccine 
with mercury and the untested H1N1 vaccine with 

In his abstract, Goldman said:
“The aim of this study was to compare the number 
of inactivated-influenza vaccine–related spontan-
eous abortion and stillbirth (SB) reports in the 
 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 
database during three consecutive flu seasons 
beginning 2008/2009 and assess the relative fetal
death reports associated with the two-vaccine 
2009/2010 season.”

The facts that Goldman exposed are extremely disturb-
ing. He highlights the fact that the safety and 
effectiveness of the A-H1N1 had never been establish-
ed in pregnant women and that the combination of two
different influenza vaccines had never been tested on
pregnant women at all.

Even more worrisome is the fact that the A-H1N1 
vaccine inserts from the various manufacturers 
contained this warning:
“It is also not known whether these vaccines can 
cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant 
women or can affect reproduction capacity.’’  
(emphasis added)
Dr. Goldman also pointed out that the developing 
fetus is indirectly exposed to mercury when thimerosal
-containing vaccines are administered to a pregnant 
woman. He outlined a study written by A.R. Gasset, 
M. Itoi, Y. Ischii and R.M. Ramer who examined what 
happened after rabbits were vaccinated with thimerosal
–containing radioactive mercury. Goldman stated that 
from one hour post-injection to six hours post-inject-
ion, the level of radioactive mercury in the blood 
dropped over 75 percent. Yet from two hours post-inje-
ction to six hours post-injection, there were signifi-
cantly increased radioactivity levels in the fetal 
brain, liver, and kidney.

Dr. Goldman concluded that because the rates of mis-
carriage reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events 
Reporting System (VAERS) for the single flu vaccine 
were relatively low, health care providers developed
a false sense of security that flu vaccines administ-
ered during pregnancy were safe.  Goldman explained 
that just because a single vaccine has been tested 
and considered to be relatively safe, this does not 
mean that vaccinating pregnant women with two or more 
Thimerosal containing vaccines will be safe for them 
or their unborn babies. Overall, Goldman firmly 
believes that the VAERS grossly underestimates the 
true rates of miscarriage and other adverse events 
encountered in the US population. Remember, it is 
estimated that  less than a tenth of true adverse re-
actions are reported to the VAERS with a one percent 
reporting rate for serious adverse events, including 
death, according to a study led by former FDA 
Commissioner Dr. David A. Kessler. [5]

As seen in the Goldman study, with the return to a 
single flu shot, the flu vaccine-related reports of 
fetal loss have returned to a significantly lower 
level compared to the high level of fetal loss reports
 in the two-dose 2009/2010 flu season. However, higher 
than background flu shot vaccine-related fetal losses 
continue to be reported to the VAERS.

Furthermore, the Goldman study recommends that the 
babies who survived the deadly double dose in utero 
be monitored:
“In addition, because of the order of magnitude 
increase in fetal-loss report rates, from 6.8 
fetal loss reports per million pregnant women 
vaccinated in the single-dose 2008/2009 season to
77.8 in the two-dose 2009/2010 season, further 
long term studies are needed to assess adverse 
outcomes in the surviving children. Additional 
research concerning potential synergistic risk 
factors associated with the administration of 
Thimerosal-containing vaccines is warranted, 
and the exposure-effect association should be 
verified in further toxicological and case-
control studies.” (emphasis added)
Aside from fetal deaths, the CDC initiative to 
increase uptake of vaccines in pregnant women 
continues to fuel the increases in the levels of 
neurodevelopmental, developmental, behavioral 
abnormalities, and chronic illness in the surviving 
children. Due to omitting reports of fetal deaths, the
 CDC enjoys success in increasing the uptake and 
number of vaccines in the pregnant population. The 
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 
is now recommending not only the flu shot (with 
mercury) but also the Tdap vaccine.


The work of NCOW and Dr. Goldman has proven that 
potential lives are being destroyed before they are 
even old enough to draw their first breath. Developing 
fetuses who are fortunate enough to survive the 
onslaught of vaccinations now being recommended to 
pregnant women then need to play a form of Russian 
Roulette from the day they are born, because their 
caring parents followed the advice they were given by
professionals who have been deliberately misguided.
Eileen Dannemann and her team have proven with their 
remarkable work that both public and professionals 
alike are being lied to and deceived by organizations 

put in place by the government to sanction our 
vaccination programs. In my opinion, this is genocide 
and the sooner people realize that all vaccines come 
with an element of risk and begin to research the 
dangers for themselves, the sooner these insane 
experiments will end.


We would like to thank Eileen Dannemann and Dr. Paul 
King for asking to report on their very 
important work.
Eileen Dannemann is the director of the National 
 Coalition of Organized Women and the founder of the 
student vaccine liberation Army 
Dr. Gary Goldman and Dr. Paul G. King, vaccine 
consultant to NCOW, have provided to the public a 
most important study.

Referencesfficial transcript

  1. OCDC’s Dr. Marie McCormick 
    denies miscarriages, Sept. 3, 2010 ACCV. 
    See page 37.
  2. Influenza Vaccine Safety Monitoring (slide 20).
    CDC’s Dr. Tom Shimabukuro confirms NCOW data ,
     Oct. 28, 2010 ACIP
  3. Letter from March of Dimes, inlcuded in this 
  4. Dr Gary Goldman Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss
    reports during three consecutive influenza 
    seasons: Was there a synergistic fetal 
    toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 
    2009/2010 season? (abstract
  5. Kessler, D.A. The Working Group. Natanblut, 
    S. Kennedy, D. Lazar, E. Rheinstein, P. et al.
    Introducing MedWatch: A New Approach to 
    Reporting Medication and Device Adverse 
    Effects and Product Problems. JAMA 1993 June 
    2. 269 (21): 2765-2768.

No comments: